- Term Sheet Pitfalls
- Posts
- Corporate Governance 101
Corporate Governance 101
Term Sheets Part IX: Control Provisions Part One


✋ Hello there! Thanks so much for giving Term Sheet Pitfalls a shot! If you’re receiving this, you’re a founder, operator, investor, or friend who we think would enjoy this newsletter. If you missed our last few posts, you can find them here:
If you were forwarded this newsletter, subscribe HERE
Our commitment to you: brief, simple, valuable content that will empower you to get smarter on VC term sheets and fundraising strategy.
We can be reached here:
Daniel Faierman ➡️ [email protected]
Chuck Cotter ➡️ [email protected]
We recommend replying with a “hi” in order to ensure that future posts don’t end up in spam world or unsubscribing at the bottom at your preference (no hard feelings).
![]() | Daniel Faierman is a Partner at Habitat Partners, an NYC-based early stage VC firm focused on pre-seed to Series A investments in the consumer and software ecosystems. Learn more about Habitat Partners on their website or notion page. Daniel has invested in numerous startups and previously operated and invested at organizations including PepsiCo, AB InBev, VMG Partners, and Selva Ventures. Daniel was a former Yale tennis 🎾 player & completed his MBA at the Stanford Graduate School of Business. |
![]() | Chuck Cotter is a Partner in Morrison Foerster’s Emerging Company + Venture Capital practice group in Denver, with experience in the consumer products space, including food, beverage, personal care, beauty, and fashion. He has represented such companies and funds in over 200 🚀 consumer financing and M&A transactions. Chuck was a rugby player at Vassar College and completed his JD at Columbia Law School. |
Voting, Boards & Protective Provisions
We’re back!
We apologize for a slight content delay as we balanced vacation schedules in August/September.
After two seasons of Term Sheet Pitfalls, we’re kicking off Season 3️⃣
We’re beyond grateful for your continuous feedback and engagement… one example of the responses we are proud to regularly receive.

We’ve covered many of the essential elements of a term sheet to date related to economics. In szn 3️⃣, we will start off by diving into governance…
DOSS 🔥 🔥
Doss has done some fantastic work for one of our top porfolio companies Mezcla and we are now partnered up for Term Sheet Pitfalls Season Three! Full disclaimer, we are not investors in Doss at Habitat Partners and I allocate a lot of my time to helping B2B SaaS companies in the Habitat portfolio. But when a founder in our portfolio voluntarily comes to me ecstatic about the value a new partner is driving, I listen.
With explosive revenue growth, Mezcla’s lean ops team needed a smarter way to manage rising order complexity. Orders were streaming in from D2C, wholesale, and retail channels—but Mezcla’s homegrown system of Airtable, Owlery, spreadsheets, and manual invoicing couldn’t keep up.
ACTION:
Replacing Airtable and Owlery, DOSS gave Mezcla a fully composable, unified platform that automates everything with an accurate view of the full order-to-cash process.
Order & sample management: Centralizes all records in tables that instantly track every step of the journey, with automated workflows triggered by sample request forms.
Freight & fulfillment: Syncs all order, shipment, and inventory data with EDI and 3PL partners, while streamlining shipment quoting and broker selection.
Finance & accounting: POs and invoices are generated automatically. No more manually entering invoices from email. Just one click to send to EDI or Quickbooks.
RESULT:
DOSS doubled Mezcla’s PO processing speed and saved the team over 12 hours per week, while contributing to continuous improvements in on-time, in-full deliveries (OTIF). Most importantly, DOSS gave them the capacity to scale without increasing headcount.
“Less manual work equals more time spent on strategic initiatives. Don’t cater towards an ERP’s requirements – look for something that’s customizable as a solution and able to adapt and scale versus something that keeps you restrained.”
To get set up with DOSS today, reply “intro to Doss.”
Quick Intro on Governance
Founders, investors, and employees have diverse motivations, beliefs, information transparency, and self-interests. These differences make the official allocation of decision-making authority cricital for startups (especially when things aren’t going well).
While public companies occasionally face activist investors, startup investors are normally active investors that exercise substantial corporate governance rights largely in the form of control provisions. In short, there are two main forms of control in VC:
Negative controls via protective provisions which give investors the power to block or veto an action
Affirmative control via boards or special voting structure (i.e., supervoting) allowing a VC to compel or vote in favor of a specific action
We’ve also already discussed several of the key economic control provisions such as liquidation preferences, anti-dilution provisions, and pro-rata rights.
VCs operate under extreme uncertainly, lacking information assymetry as the norm. As a result of negotiations that reflect investor concerns over risk, the final contractual structure between a startup and investor often leads to a separation between cash flow rights (economics - allah TSP Seasons 1/2) and governance rights.
We can define corporate governance as a set of principles and mechanisms that balances the interests of company stakeholders (not only shareholders but also employees, customers, suppliers, etc) and affects control over company decision-making.
Governance disputes not only take place between founders and investors, but also arise between investors. As startups mature and raise follow-on capital, the initially negotiated contractual provisions between founders and early investors are futher complicated by the addition of new investors looking to negotiate their own control provisions considering their own self-interests.
In today’s post we will begin to cover the workings of corporate governance with a focus on how term sheets and their associated long form contractual documents dictate board control, voting rights, and protective provisions (several key elements of control provisions). We’ll do our best to keep this simple as it’s not the most exhilirating topic (yet very important).
Topics in today’s post:
Basics of Voting Rights
Unique Voting Scenarios
Class-Level Voting
Boards: Formation, Roles, Structures
Overview of Protective Provisions
The Basics of Voting Rights
Corportate charters make decisions subject to shareholder approval as a result of negotiations between founder-managers and various investor classes. Shareholder voting rules determine the process by which shareholders approve such decisions. Common provisions in the charter include:
Cash flow rights (liquidation prefs, conversion rules, etc)
Restrictions on the sale, liquidation, or restructuring of the company
Ownership structure (classes/series of shares and amount to be issued)
Board of Directors procedures
Protective provisions for specific shareholder classes
Share Counts
Corporate votes are undertaken by shareholders. The number of shares that a startup issues (aka the potential number of votes) is limited by the companies charter. The charter dictates authorized shares (or “stock”), which is the MAX number of shares of each class a company can issue without further shareholder approval. This figure is important to recognize because it may prevent company decision-makers from issuing more shares in the future (which would dilute exisiting shareholders).
Issued Shares: those that the company has issued to shareholders; can’t be greater than the number of shares authorized to be issued for that class
Oustanding Shares: shares owned by shareholders such as investors or employees (could be in process of vesting).
Issued stock are all the shares a company has ever distributed to investors, while outstanding stock are the shares currently held by investors (excluding any treasury shares reacquired by the company itself).
We’ll skip one more point but there is typically a buffer that dictates how many more shares the company can issue without needing to amend the charter.
Lastly, as we have previously dicussed, shares can be issued in the form of common or preferred. Preferred shares are senior to common and are typically rewarded to investors with common posesssed by owners.
Voting
Who has the right to vote?
Who doesn’t?
What are common voting mechanisms?
What are uncommon voting mechanisms?
All of this is in the context of startups (not public cos).
Who has the right to vote? Who doesn’t?
DOES
Outstanding common share shareholders
Preferred share shareholders (vote on an as-converted basis = same voting rights as if converted to common even though they don’t have to convert to vote)
Restricted stock units (have the same right to vote as the shares the RSUs represent… typically common shares). Sometimes deliberately classified as non-voting.
Vested and Unvested shares (founders tend to have a lot of their stock under vesting conditions but the unvested portion carries the right to vote
DOES NOT
Non-voting common shares typically issued to employees who join at a later stage of company with rationale being to not dilute voting rights of current shareholders
Authorized but not yet issued shares
Treasury shares
Stock options/warrants
Debt
Typical Voting Mechanism
Standard: commonly, a simple majority (> 50%) of all eligible votes should be in favor of a proposal to be approved. Further, standard voting implies that one common share has one vote and one preferred share has one vote. A slightly alternative structure may mandate that at least a majority of eligible voters participate in a vote and that a majority of those casted votes dictate the outcome.
Unique Voting Structures
Supermajority: require votes in excess of the majority; frequenty established in the charter and typically only apply to certain scenarios / investor classes. Supermajority thresholds are often set to give a minority investor veto power.
Supervoting: When some companies go public, they have different classes of shares with different voting rights aka a dual-class structure. While not unheard of in the startup world, this dynamic is less common. Google, Meta, Snap, and other public companies feature dual-class structures in which there are 2+ classes of common stock with the same cash flow rights but different voting rights. While less common, such supervoting shares can also exist for startups.
Supervoting shares entails one class of shares having more votes than another voting class of shares. It distances cash flow and voting rights from each other. In the VC industry supervoting has been heavily debated as companies with supervoting like Theranos, Uber, and WeWork have encountered governance controversies. Founders are typically the beneficiaries (for better or worse) as their voting power becomes a multiple (like 10x) of their share count.
How it typically works:
Create two classes of common stock
One class has substantially more votes per share than the other (with founders receiving the high vote class); often 10 votes per share to the high-vote class
Existing investors grandfathered and receive supervoting preferred shares
Other common (employees, ex-employees) and new investors see major dilution in voting power (but not necessarily in ownership)
Elizabeth Holmes set this up in a way where she got 100 votes per share essentially eliminating the power of the other shareholders. You can imagine a supervoting structure that is heavily favorable to founders allows them to essentually control all votes (i.e., selling their business when they want).
IPO exception:
In the context of IPOs, putting in place what’s called a springing dual class structure is more common. In such a case the one person, one vote construct is kept in place while the company is private… but immediately prior to the IPO, the dual class springs into action. All existing shares at the time of the IPO convert into supervoting shares (including both common and preferred). The shares issued in the IPO have the regular one person, one vote structure. In theory, over time the VCs will exit their positions by selling their stock and when they do the supervoting associated with those shares dissappears. Then you are left with the founders possessing supervoting while the public holds just one vote per share.
Class-Level Voting
VCs often negotiate specific voting provisions so that they can block an adverse action. Such provisions are implemented through different voting scenarios in which separate classes have to approve a mandate. In the following scenarios, the voting still follows the same majority, supermajority, and supervoting rules previously discussed.
Single Class: preferred and common vote as a single class so that approval simply requires the (super)majority of total votes resulting from adding all common and preferred shares
Separate Class of Preferred: proposal can’t be approved unless the (super)majority of all preferred votes occurs, voting together but separately from common
Subset Class of Preferred: a subset of preferred investors vote together as a class (i.e., Series A only or Series C/D only). Such votes exclude not only common shareholders but also other preferred shareholders.
As you can see, 2/3 increasingly give power to VCs.
Board of Directors
Voting is a critical component of control provisions. While somewhat boring, other control provisions also matter A LOT and can prevent a VC from running afoul of the fiduciary duties they owe to their investors & company. Same goes for the founder.
Protective provisions determine which actions preferred shareholders can impact, which can prevent a CEO’s from taking a significant action in certain cases.
Board composition can impact if a CEO is hired or fired.
Now that we’ve covered voting, we’ll focus on several of the main control provisions:
Boards (governance/affirmative control)
Protective provisions (negative control)
Board Roles, Elections, and Types
The board of directors is a group of individuals that represent sharesholders in major corporate decisions. A critical responsibility is the oversight of management - simply, the ability to fire of hire the CEO. Other board activities include assesing company performance, providing strategic guidance, developing corporate policy, approving budgets, options plans, mergers/IPOs, and fundraising.
Our POV:
Board members are not the ultimate stategic decision makers. While board members can actively weigh in on strategic decisions, the CEO reserves the right to do what they believe is right even if it defies board wisdom. A good board member let’s the CEO run/control the business and board meetings without disruption. A board member may offer advice from prior experiences, ask valuable questions, and serve as a sounding board. They do not implement or force strategic day to day actions.
Typical structure:
As VCs close financing rounds with startups, defining board composition is part of the closing/negotiation process. Lead investors (usually those that make >50% of the round) often negotiate for the right to elect one or more directors by themselves - early lead investors typically make financing contingent upon receiving a board seat, which will usually represent all preferred shareholders participating in the financing. VCs will often bring a board observor along who deosn’t have technical voting power (someone more junior in the VC firm or another VC in the financing).
The second seat is usually reserved for common shareholders and designated to be the CEO. This is often the founder but not always. The language states “CEO” specifically so that the board seat is always filled by the current acting CEO (founders leave companies, CEOs are replaced by new CEOs, etc). “Ruling from the grave” is common term that refers to a board seat that is filled by someone no longer active in the day-to-day of the company.
The third seat is reserved for an independent. This is someone not directly affiliated with the company through an investor or officer role. The independent is generally approved by the two other board members. This person often has relevant industry experience (former CEOs or execs of relevant companies) and can help the company with networking and insights while mediating issues between the common-elect and investor-elect.
Seems pretty straightforward right? This structure is quite fair in theory. One rep for the investors, one rep for the common, and one “neutral” third party to break a split.
Of course it’s not always like this. As new financings are completed, new VCs often join the board, disrupting the balance. Sometimes the CEO wil ask to add another independent to combat this dynamic.
A few other examples:
5-Person Board: often Founder, CEO or Founder #2, VC #1, VC #2, independent
As companies mature you may see bigger boards with 7-9+ members. As boards become sizable most of the additions are strategic independents who can add unique value to the business.
Some founders insist on having what’s called a “common-controlled” board, in which case there are more board members representing the common than the other classes of shareholders. The motivation is obvious: if common controls the board, the the VCs can’t really fire the founder/CEO. Uber is an example of this. Travis K established an 11-person board. Seven seats were filled of which Travis controlled three. He also had the right to fill the last four seats at his discretion. So if the board tried to remove him, he could have filled the last four seats. In the end Travis resigned anyways.
Board member etiquette: board members and observors should be reimbursed for reasonable out of pocket expenses when attending board meetings but it’s rare to receive cash compensation for serving on the board of an early stage startup. Outside board members are often offered stock options (0.25-0.5% with vesting) just like employees as well as the opportunity to invest in the business alongside the VCs.
If board votes are contentious, the company is generally in trouble. Instead of controlling the board, VCs prefer to leverage protective provisions to provide the control they want over the company, effectively granting veto rights on certain actions… good transition to the next topic.
Protective Provisions
Protective provisions (negative controls) are contractual clauses that have the goal of preventing the company and its shareholders from taking actions without getting explicit consent of the investors protected by the provisions. They effectively are veto rights that investors (preferred shareholders) have on actions so that they are protected against expropriation.
Protective provisions are in addition to other control provisions that are negotiated such as board seats. A key benefit of protective provisions to investors is that they allow investors to capture value in a way that can be harmful to a startup. This is not the case with boards, in which board members are supposed to act in the interest of the company by default.
Over time, protective provisions have mostly become standardized as opposed to contentiously negotiated. Obviously, founders would like to see little to no protective provisions when contracting; however, VCs want some veto-level control esepcially when it can impact the VC’s economic position. Founders should check with council if any requested protective provisions are abnormal; however, the below is pretty standard.
Common provisions:
Authorize the creation of stock
Ensures preferred (VCs) get to vote on future financings
Change the terms of VC-owned stock
Issue stock senior or equal to the VCs
Selling or merging the company (liquidity events)
Declaring bankrupcy or recapitalize without the VC’s approval
Taking on debt
Change the board size
License away the IP of the company without VC’s consent
Pay or declare a dividend
Change certificate of incorporation or bylaws
Buy back common stock or increase the option plan
A lot of the above is essentially things that effect the economics of the VCs investment (raising more money by creating new stock, selling the company or IP, increasing the option pool). Thus, protective provisions in a sense really just serve to protect VCs against the erosion of the economic value of their investement.
When future follow on financings occur, there is a discussion on how the protective provisions will work with regard to the new shareholder class. There are two cases:
New investor class gets own separate protective provisions
New investor class votes alongside original investors as one class
Founders will almost always want a single voting class for the investors as two separate classes equates to two separate sets of veto constituents to deal with… but new investors will often ask for a separate vote given their interests may diverge from those of the early investors due to different pricing, risk profile, etc (Series B may need a 3x exit from here whereas early investors might be happy with a sale at today’s valuation). To keep things clean/simple, many experienced investors will sign up to not separate classes in order to prevent the potential headaches of another equity class vetoing important actions.
Today, we convered two of the main control provision categories:
Boards for affirmative action
Protective Provisions for negative control
In our next post we’ll cover a few other key control provisions that mainly relate to the approval of exits and sale/purchase of stock (transfer rights):
Drag-Along Rights
Tag-Along Rights
Registration Rights
Redemption Rights
Stock Restrictions: ROFR/ROFO
If you enjoyed this article, feel free to view recent prior articles:
Ongoing Term Glossary
Anti-Dilution Rights: offer investors protection against dilution in unfavorable financing rounds. This term is usually not contentious from a negotiation perspective between founder and investor - in fact, studies have founds that 92-95% of preferred stock financings include some form of anti-dilution protection.
Authorized shares: the MAX number of shares of each class a company can issue without further shareholder approval.
Automatic Conversion: in the context of convertible notes (or SAFEs), a clause that triggers a convertible note to automatically convert into equity at maturity.
Board of directors: a group of individuals that represent sharesholders in major corporate decisions. A critical responsibility is the oversight of management - simply, the ability to fire of hire the CEO. Other board activities include assesing company performance, providing strategic guidance, developing corporate policy, approving budgets, options plans, mergers/IPOs, and fundraising.
Bridge Financing: when investors agree to provide temporary financing to secure a company’s cash balance before the company raises their next priced round - aka the bridge that gets you to your next priced round.
Capped Price: conversion price per share awarded to noteholder (or SAFE holder) if investor exercises valuation cap
Change in control: a significant shift in the ownership or control of a company, often triggering specific rights or obligations for investors (M&A most commonly)
Clawback provisions: provisions that give the company the right to buy back vested shares at the original issue price or at fair market value after dismissing an employee under defined circumstances (leaving for a competitor, severe misconduct, etc)
Co-Invest: triggered when a fund raises “one-off” new capital from LPs/investors (as opposed to pulling from existing permanent fund) to unlock ability to execute an investment; associated management fees and carry (if any) typically flow back to the fund or individual who raised the co-invest capital. Funds often give major LPs prioritized “co-invest“ rights, which gives such LPs the first rights to participate in the co-invest opportunity before others.
Comparable Company Analysis: a valuation methodology that entails identifying comparable companies and transactions to the company being valued as a means of deriving multiples that can be used to generate a landed valuation
Confidentiality: prevents the startup from disclosing the terms of a term sheet to outside parties (i.e., other investors, startups). This enables both parties to negotiate in good faith.
Convertible Note: a debt instrument that can be converted to equity based on the occurrence of certain events (most commonly during a priced equity financing round).
Conversion: convertible notes (and SAFEs) automatically convert into equity if certain triggers occur. The most common trigger that leads to the conversion of a convertible note (or SAFE) into equity is a priced equity financing round
Corporate governance: a set of principles and mechanisms that balances the interests of company stakeholders (not only shareholders but also employees, customers, suppliers, etc) and affects control over company decision-making
Debt repayment terms: in the context of convertible notes, defines specifics associated with principal, interest rate, maturity date, and default provisions.
Definitive documents: the legal contracts between the investors and the company that detail the terms of the transaction and are drafted by a lawyer
Dilution (D): losing a portion of your ownership as the company sells equity to investors
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF): a valuation methodology that entails forecasting the future cash flows of a business and discounting the cash flows by a determined cost of capital to derive an enterprise value
Discount: a discount is a term awarded to the convertible noteholder (or SAFE holder) that drives a reduction in the conversion price per share that they are awarded during a qualified financing. Discounts typically range from 10-30% with 20% being the most common.
Down Round: when the pre-money valuation of a future financing is lower than the post-money valuation of the prior financing; often seen as a negative sign for the company
Double-trigger: requires two events to occur to accelerate the completion of your vesting. The first trigger is the acquisition, and the second trigger is the founder or employee getting terminated by the acquirer without cause or good reason in a specified period (typically one year)
Employee Option Pool (EOP): stock that is reserved for existing and future employees to compensate, retain, and motivate workforce
Equity conversion terms: in the context of convertible notes, defines the specific event(s) that triggers conversion of debt to equity, the formula used during conversion (considering the impact of the valuation cap and/or discount – to be discussed), the type of equity received upon conversion by the note holder (common vs. preferred equity), and any associated rights the new equity holders will get after their convertible note is converted to equity (voting, dividends, etc).
Exclusivity: often referred to as a “no shop,” this provision locks parties into negotiating only with each other for a defined period (i.e., 30-60 days)
Exercise (options): buy options at the strike price
Full Ratchet Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward all the way the price of the shares issued in the new round. Full-Ratchet is the most investor friendly.
Fund Model: a forecasting exercise that a VC conducts to project what a successful fund will look like in terms of returns from each investment. VCs typically build a pathway to 3.0x net DPI
Indifference point: the price per share at which the noteholder or SAFE holder is indifferent between exercising the discount or valuation cap
Interest Rate & Payments: convertible notes often feature interest rates. Unlike a traditional loan, startups rarely pay the interest in cash to the convertible noteholder periodically. Instead, convertible notes accrue interest until the time of conversion.
Issued Shares: those that the company has issues to shareholders; can’t be greater than the number of shares authorized to be issued for that class
Lead Investor: primary investor(s) (co-leads can exist) in a funding round that set terms and typically are writing the largest check(s); often take a board seat
Legally nonbinding: refers to the nature of term sheets. A signed term sheet does not legally mandate a deal be completed
Liquidation Preference: is one of the rights that makes preferred stock more valuable than common stock and a large part of why investors agree to purchase the right to preferred stock (i.e., SAFEs or convertible notes) or purchase preferred stock directly during financings. Liquidation preference is the legal entitlement to receive a pre-determined portion of a company’s value in the event of a sale or liquidity event before the holders of common stock (i.e. the right to get paid first in an exit).
Major Investor: refers to a participating investor in a financing that surpasses a certain check size threshold, unlocking certain rights. I.e., “all those who invest over $500k will be deemed major investors and shall receive information and pro rata rights”
Maturity: the date at which the debt (plus any accrued interest) is due for repayment. This is typically 12, 18, or 24 months from the issuance of the convertible note. We will talk about conversion momentarily but the norm for a convertible note is that it has converted into equity prior to the maturity date
Maturity Extension: in the context of convertible notes, this entails moving the maturity date back. A common alternative to repayment is for the company and noteholders to agree to an extension on the maturity date of the note
Multiple: a ratio that is calculated by dividing the valuation of an asset by a specific item on the financial statements
Multiplier (Liquidation Preferences): Multiplier refers to the multiple on the original price per share of a class or series of preferred stock an investor is entitled to receive before others get paid. A 1x preference means getting paid one times the original investment, a 3x preference would mean getting paid three times the original investment back before the next most senior preference is paid.
Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC): compares the value of an investment on the exit date to the initial equity contribution
Non-priced financing: financing round in which founder and VC do not explicitly set a share price and thus do not set an associated pre-money valuation (i.e., convertible notes, SAFEs)
Option pool: an amount of common stock primarily reserved in the cap table for future employees (in certain cases, options can be pulled out of the option pool for existing employees/founders as well)
Optional conversion: in the context of convertible notes, entitles the noteholder to convert their note into equity if desired if the note is still outstanding on the maturity date.
Oustanding Shares: shares owned by shareholders such as investors or employees (could be in process of vesting).
Ownership (O): the % of a company a shareholder possesses prior to or post-closing of a financing.
Participation (Liquidation Preferences): is the right of a preferred stock to participate in remaining acquisition proceeds (on an as-converted to common stock basis, along with common stock) after the initial multiplier liquidation preference is satisfied. When preferred stockholders have a participation preference it’s called “double dipping” as preferred stockholder enjoys preferential return of capital in liquidation preference and then enjoys pro rata share of remaining proceeds. Participation can be capped (limited to a certain multiple) or uncapped.
Prepayment: in the context of convertible notes, payment of the principal and accrued interest by the startup before the note matures. This is generally only allowed if there is a majority of supermajority vote in favor of prepayment by the noteholders.
Post-Money Valuation (PO): the valuation of the company after the round size is invested by the VC(s)
Pre-Money Valuation (PM): what the investor is valuing the company at TODAY, prior to the investment
Priced round/financing: a round of financing in which the valuation and price per share of a unit of stock being sold is officially determined (as opposed to a SAFE or convertible note in which case the valuation is left officially undetermined)
Price Per Share (PPS): the cost of acquiring a share of company x, typically determined by pre-money valuation and fully diluted shares outstanding prior to close of financing
Principal: in the context of convertible notes, the amount of investment provided by the noteholder (investor) to the company through the convertible note. In an unfortunate scenario where the note never converts to equity (we will discuss this), the principal (plus any accrued interest) is what the company owes the noteholder (unless nuanced legal terms dictate otherwise). Assuming the note does convert to equity (the norm), the principal (plus any accrued interest) is the quantity used to calculate how many shares the note holder will receive upon conversion into equity.
Pro rata rights: give investors the right (but not obligation) to participate in future rounds of financing to maintain their initial level of percentage ownership in the company.
Pro rata on a dollar-for-dollar basis: gives the investor the right to invest an amount equal to or less than the amount invested in their first round à VC Z invested 200K in the seed round and has the right to invest 200k in the Series A
Pro rata on a fixed sum basis: least common, investors get the right to continue investing an amount as agreed upon that is decoupled from the investment amount. VC Z, who invested $1M in a seed, negotiates pro rata rights up to $700K - they will be able to invest up to $700K in each subsequent round of financing.
Pro Rata ROFR: gives particular investor(s) the right to another investors voluntarily waived pro rata in a future financing
Protective provisions (negative controls) are contractual clauses that have the goal of preventing the company and its shareholders from taking actions without getting explicit consent of the investors protected by the provisions. They effectively are veto rights that investors (preferred shareholders) have on actions so that they are protected against expropriation.
Qualified financing: in the context of convertible notes/SAFEs, the round size of an equity financing typically must meet a certain dollar threshold to trigger conversion into equity.
QSBS: a tax benefit under Section 1202 that incentivizes investment into small businesses (often startups) with less than $50 million in aggregate gross asset value. Investors who purchase stock (common or preferred) directly (as opposed to via secondaries) from a c-corp business with less than $50 million in aggregate gross asset value and hold that investment for > 5 years, followed by a sale of the held stock, can avoid paying capital gains tax. The tax exclusion can be up to 100% of the gain, subject to limits: the greater of $10 million or 10x the original investment. Recently big beautiful bill updates: 1/ asset value threshold up to $75 million, 2/ cap limit extended to higher of $15 million or 10x investment, and 3/ exclusion starts to come into play after just three years (at 50% exclusion potential).
QSBS Gain Deferral: if you have to liquidate a position before the QSBS holding period requirement ends, you can defer the tax on capital gains, by reinvesting the gains into another QSBS qualified business within 60 days of liquidation. You also get to roll over the holding period of the original investment, continuing the clock (as opposed to starting over).
Repayment: in the context of convertible notes, the process of paying back the debt (plus any accrued interest) due to noteholders
Restricted Stock: company stock given to employees, usually as a bonus or additional compensation; does not have a strike price unlike options; usually awarded to company directors and executives and is subject to vesting
Round Size or Investment Amount (R): how much capital the founder is raising for the financing or VC round
RSUs: refers to an agreement by a company to issue employees shares on a future date. One RSU is the right to get one common share. RSUs, like options, are also subject to a time-based vesting schedule and can be trigger based; however, RSUs don’t have a strike price and are instead released directly to the recipient after vesting without any need to “exercise” or buy them; typically awarded to lower level employees than restricted stock
SAFE: an agreement between an investor and a company that converts into equity in the next financing round if certain conditions are met
Seniority (Liquidation Preferences): refers to whether preference is senior, junior or even (pari passu) with other preferred stock. Senior preference means having a first-tier liquidation right, junior preference means having a liquidation right that is paid after the senior preferred and pari passu means preference amongst different preferred stock is the same time.
Single-trigger: states that only one event must occur to accelerate the vesting of your equity. If the company is acquired, you gain complete ownership over all your options
Stock options: incentive mechanisms granted to employees, advisors, and consultants. Employees joining a VC-backed startup typically receive an option grant, which allows them to acquire company common shares in the future at a certain price by “exercising vested options”
Strike Price: the predetermined price an employee pays to exercise (aka purchase) their stock options and turn their stock options into actual shares of the company owned outright. Tax regulations (IRS Section 409a) require options grants to have a strike price equal to or above the fair market value of the underlying company stock on the date that the option is granted
‘Success disaster’: employees run the risk of being harmed financially for building a succeeding business that has grown in value significantly
Supermajority: require votes in excess of the majority; frequenty established in the charter and typically only apply to certain scenarios / investor classes. Supermajority thresholds are often set to give a minority investor veto power.
Supervoting: Supervoting shares entails one class of shares having more votes than another voting class of shares. It distances cash flow and voting rights from each other. In the VC industry supervoting has been heavily debated as companies with supervoting like Theranos, Uber, and WeWork have encountered governance controversies. Founders are typically the beneficiaries (for better or worse) as their voting power becomes a multiple (like 10x) of their share count.
Uncapped Note/SAFE: a convertible note (or SAFE) that lacks a valuation cap
Up Round: when the pre-money valuation of a future financing is higher than the post-money valuation of the prior financing; often seen as a positive sign for the company
Valuation: the process of deriving an enterprise value for a company
Valuation Cap: a valuation cap is an investor favorable terms that puts a ceiling on the conversion price at which a convertible note or SAFE would convert into the equity security sold at the qualified financing.
VC Valuation Method: a valuation methodology that entails projecting a company’s exit value in the future and a VC’s required MOIC in order to back into an implied valuation and ownership level at time of investment (starting with the future and backing into the present)
Vesting: the process of gaining ownership over granted stock options
Voluntary conversion: in the context of convertible notes, gives the investor (noteholder) the power to convert into equity whenever desired (even before maturity) under specified details, negating any prepayment potential
Warrants: when issued/contracted, give the warrant holder the right to buy a certain number of shares of the company’s common or preferred stock at a predefined price over a specified period
Weighted Average Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward to a value between the price originally paid by the protected investor and the price paid by the investors in the current (down) round.
PM + R = PO ➡️ the pre-money valuation plus the round size = the post-money valuation
PO – R = PM ➡️ the post-money valuation minus the round size = the pre-money valuation
PM / FDSO = PPS ➡️ the pre-money valuation divided by shares outstanding = price per share
R / PO = O ➡️ round size divided by the post-money valuation is the amount of ownership acquired in a financing by participating investors
D / PO = Daniel’s O ➡️ Daniel’s investment divided by the post-money valuation is the amount of ownership Daniel is acquiring in a financing
Fundraising
Rule #1: Communicate early and consistently. Goal: build long term relationships with a roster of investors before you kick off a process.
Rule #2: Ask for help. The only way to get maximal value out of your cap table is by asking for help. Especially when times are tough, great investors can potentially be the difference between make or break.
Rule #3: Keep knocking. As hard as it is, keep communicating with rejectors and make them aware of your progress.
Dont #1: OVER-FOMOing
Don’t #2: Focusing on who instead of what
Don’t #3: Exaggerating objectively “auditable” traction
Don’t #4: Asking for follow up intros from rejectors
Is there a topic you’d like us to cover? Don’t be a stranger! Ever want to dive deeper on a topic in VC Investing or Law?
We can be reached here:
Daniel Faierman ➡️ [email protected]
Chuck Cotter ➡️ [email protected]
If you enjoyed this post, please share on LinkedIn, X (fka Twitter), Meta and elsewhere. It goes a long way to support us! If you didn’t, don’t be scared to unsubscribe (we appreciate honest feedback).
📢 Follow the Term Sheet Pitfalls authors on LinkedIn:
✍️ Written by Daniel Faierman and Chuck Cotter

Disclaimer: The information provided in this entry does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal or investment advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available in this entry are for general informational purposes only.