Anti-Dilution Provisions

Term Sheets Part VIII: Anti-Dilution

Hello there! Thanks so much for giving Term Sheet Pitfalls a shot! If you’re receiving this, you’re a founder, operator, investor, or friend who we think would enjoy this newsletter. If you missed our last few posts, you can find them here:

If you were forwarded this newsletter, subscribe HERE

Our commitment to you: brief, simple, valuable content that will empower you to get smarter on VC term sheets and fundraising strategy.

We can be reached here:

Daniel Faierman ➡️ [email protected] 

Chuck Cotter ➡️ [email protected]

We recommend replying with a “hi” in order to ensure that future posts don’t end up in spam world or unsubscribing at the bottom at your preference (no hard feelings).

Daniel Faierman is a Partner at Habitat Partners, an NYC-based early stage VC firm focused on pre-seed to Series A investments in the consumer and software ecosystems. Learn more about Habitat Partners on their website or notion page. Daniel has invested in numerous startups and previously operated and invested at organizations including PepsiCo, AB InBev, VMG Partners, and Selva Ventures. Daniel was a former Yale tennis 🎾 player & completed his MBA at the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Chuck Cotter is a Partner in Morrison Foerster’s Emerging Company + Venture Capital practice group in Denver, with experience in the consumer products space, including food, beverage, personal care, beauty, and fashion. He has represented such companies and funds in over 200 🚀 consumer financing and M&A transactions. Chuck was a rugby player at Vassar College and completed his JD at Columbia Law School.

Anti-Dilution Provisions

We hope you enjoyed our last post on all things QSBS, which also covered recent QSBS updates in the big beautiful bill. Pitchbook and Business Insider dropped their respective synopses last week as well.

Back to term sheets ➡️ today we will dive into a common investor right called anti-dilution protection. Before doing so, let’s briefly review the concept of dilution through the pie metaphor:

🥧….

  • A startup starts as a pie that is entirely owned by the founder(s). The goal is to grow the pie as much as possible synonymous with increasing the valuation of the startup.

  • As the pie grows, new stakeholders (investors, employees, etc) acquire portions of the pie, reducing the pie ownership % of prior owners (this is dilution).

  • Nonetheless, the value of the portion of the pie that prior owners possess increases over time even as new stakeholders come in…. as long as the overall pie is growing enough.

  • While prior owners are left with a smaller percentage of the pie as the pie gets bigger overall, the portion they are left is more valuable (they end up with a smaller portion of a much bigger pie if things go well).

and in VC terms ➡️ …

  • A founder incorporates with 100% ownership.

  • He or she raises $1M in seed capital at a $10M post-money valuation. Now the founder has been diluted by 10pps down to 90% ownership but his or her stake is worth $9M.

  • Let’s say the founder raises another $2M at a $20M post-money valuation. The founder is thus selling another 10pps of equity and will absorb 90% of the dilution, leaving him or her with 81% ownership, the new investor with 10% ownership, and the seed investor with 9% ownership.

  • While the founder has been diluted by 19pps since incorporating, his or her stake is worth $16.2M (not bad).

Formally, dilution is a decrease in exisiting shareholders’ ownership stake in a company due to new shares being issued.

In prior posts we’ve talked about a few key term sheet provisions that impact dilution and actions investors (and in some cases founders) take to protect themselves from such dilution. For example:

  • Pro Rata Rights: protect investors from future dilution by allowing them to invest in future financings after their initial investment.

  • Valuation: the combo of round size and valuation determines the portion of the company that is being sold and therefore, the level of dilution that will occur.

  • Options: pools can be created to protect investors from future dilution at closing; conversely incremental options can be allocated to existing employees and founders to up their stake in the business and fend off dilution.

  • Voting rights: we haven’t discussed but investors may ask for voting rights so that they can block a financial transaction that is averse to their interests

  • Anti-Dilution

If pro rata rights help an investor protect their ownership when things are going well (during an “up” ⬆️ round), anti-dilution helps investors protect their ownership when things aren’t going well (during a “down” ⬇️ round).

In today’s post, we’ll dive into the following:

What is anti-dilution? How common is it in term sheets?

In a perfect world, every VC-backed startup would post strong growth/profitability, increase its value over time, and issue each subsequent financing round at a higher valuation until exit. In practice this is of course not the norm. Down rounds happen. ~30% of VC financings in 2024 were down/flat rounds. In fact, even successful companies sometimes have down rounds (Klarna, AirBnB, Stripe, etc).

The lower the price of a down round, the more dilution existing shareholders experience. Investors routinely negotiate for anti-dilution rights that offer protection against dilution in unfavorable financing rounds. This term is usually not contentious from a negotiation perspective between founder and investor - in fact, studies have found that 92-95% of preferred stock financings include some form of anti-dilution protection (Kaplan, 2003; Williams, 2017).

The anti-dilution protection is triggered if a company issues a new series of preferred shares at a price per share (PPS) below that paid by the protected investor(s) previously.

We will discuss the specific types of anti-dilution but in short, investors are “trued up” through an adjustment to the price of their preferred shares (aka conversion ratio). Thus, when converted to common stock (if that happens in future), those preferred shares represent a larger number of common shares than they would have before the down round. This adjustment increases the investor’s effective ownership percentage, helping to compensate for the dilution caused by the new, lower-priced share issuance.

In the simplest terms, as an investor, you’re getting a bonus in ownership by having the right to use a lower PPS to convert to common compared to the PPS that you paid when you originally invested.

Scott Kupor has called this “shmuck insurance” - in his words: “we think the company is worth $5 dollars per share on the day we invest, but if, in the future, the valuation turns our to be $2 dollars per share, the insurance provides a price adjustment to minimize the otherwise dilutive effect of the $2 per share financing round.”

What impact does anti-dilution have on founders?

Not good for the founders in short. In effect they are subsidizing the VCs’ anti-dilution protection by eating the dilution on their end as they do not have anti-dilution protection. So while down rounds are painful for everyone, they are particularly painful for founders due to anti-dilution protections. This is the risk of overpricing a previous financing and/or performing below expectations. Down rounds can have real economic consequences not only through the drop in PPS but also in the form of anti-dilution provisions being exercised.

Exceptions that may help fend off founder dilution during a down round:

1/ In certain cases, a VC may be willing to offset some of the founder/employee dilution by increasing the option pool (even though that will dilute the VC) and granting additional options to the founders/employees. While not the norm, this can become crucial to keep the the team motivated.

2/ If a new investor is coming into a down round, that investor may threaten to withdraw their investment if existing investors exercise their anti-dilution.

What should founders do?

Don’t get hung up fighting anti-dilution rights as it is a standard term that VCs get. Instead, do your best to minimize their impact by building value in your company and milestone planning appropriately/conservatively in alignment with your investors (aka avoiding a down round… easier said than done)

What are the different types of anti-dilution rights?

There are several flavors of anti-dilution rights with varying levels of “investor friendliness”… for the record, nearly 100% of traditional preferred stock VC rounds include anti-dilution protection, overwhelmingly of the weighted average type. Full-ratchet clauses are rare and typically seen only in investor-favored or distressed situations.

Weighted Average Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward to a value between the price originally paid by the protected investor and the price paid by the investors in the current (down) round.

We will show a simulation in the next section but it’s important to note that the anti-dilution calculations are always done on an “as-if converted to common stock” basis even despite the fact that one is buying preferred stock.

There are two flavors of weighted average anti-dilution that specify the definition of common stock outstanding (you’ll see how the counting of common stock outstanding comes into play in the simulation):

  • Broad-Based: encompasses both the companies common stock outstanding (including all common stock issuable upon conversion of its preferred stock) as well as the number of shares of common stock that could be obtained by converting all other options, rights, and securities.

  • Narrow-Based: does not include these other convertible securities and will limit the calculation to only include currently outstanding securities.

Full Ratchet Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward all the way the price of the shares issued in the new round. Full-Ratchet is the most investor friendly. In the example I gave above re Scott Kupor, the VC would ignore its original $5 per share price and reset its stock holdings based on the $2 per share price (aka the numer of shares that the VC will now hold based on its original investment in the company increase by ~2.5x (5/2). Ouch for the common.

We will show a simulation next but it’s important to note that the anti-dilution calculations are always done on an as-if converted to common stock basis even despite the fact that one is buying preferred stock.

Anti-Dilution Cap Table Simulations

No Anti-Dilution Protection

Full-Ratchet Anti-Dilution Protection

Weighted Average Anti-Dilution

If you enjoyed this article, feel free to view recent prior articles:

Ongoing Term Glossary

Anti-Dilution Rights: offer investors protection against dilution in unfavorable financing rounds. This term is usually not contentious from a negotiation perspective between founder and investor - in fact, studies have founds that 92-95% of preferred stock financings include some form of anti-dilution protection.

Automatic Conversion: in the context of convertible notes (or SAFEs), a clause that triggers a convertible note to automatically convert into equity at maturity

Bridge Financing: when investors agree to provide temporary financing to secure a company’s cash balance before the company raises their next priced round - aka the bridge that gets you to your next priced round.

Capped Price: conversion price per share awarded to noteholder (or SAFE holder) if investor exercises valuation cap

Change in control: a significant shift in the ownership or control of a company, often triggering specific rights or obligations for investors (M&A most commonly)

Clawback provisions: provisions that give the company the right to buy back vested shares at the original issue price or at fair market value after dismissing an employee under defined circumstances (leaving for a competitor, severe misconduct, etc)

Co-Invest: triggered when a fund raises “one-off” new capital from LPs/investors (as opposed to pulling from existing permanent fund) to unlock ability to execute an investment; associated management fees and carry (if any) typically flow back to the fund or individual who raised the co-invest capital. Funds often give major LPs prioritized “co-invest“ rights, which gives such LPs the first rights to participate in the co-invest opportunity before others.

Comparable Company Analysis: a valuation methodology that entails identifying comparable companies and transactions to the company being valued as a means of deriving multiples that can be used to generate a landed valuation

Confidentiality: prevents the startup from disclosing the terms of a term sheet to outside parties (i.e., other investors, startups). This enables both parties to negotiate in good faith.

Convertible Note: a debt instrument that can be converted to equity based on the occurrence of certain events (most commonly during a priced equity financing round).

Conversion: convertible notes (and SAFEs) automatically convert into equity if certain triggers occur. The most common trigger that leads to the conversion of a convertible note (or SAFE) into equity is a priced equity financing round

Debt repayment terms: in the context of convertible notes, defines specifics associated with principal, interest rate, maturity date, and default provisions.

Definitive documents:  the legal contracts between the investors and the company that detail the terms of the transaction and are drafted by a lawyer

Dilution (D): losing a portion of your ownership as the company sells equity to investors

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF): a valuation methodology that entails forecasting the future cash flows of a business and discounting the cash flows by a determined cost of capital to derive an enterprise value

Discount: a discount is a term awarded to the convertible noteholder (or SAFE holder) that drives a reduction in the conversion price per share that they are awarded during a qualified financing. Discounts typically range from 10-30% with 20% being the most common.

Down Round: when the pre-money valuation of a future financing is lower than the post-money valuation of the prior financing; often seen as a negative sign for the company

Double-trigger: requires two events to occur to accelerate the completion of your vesting. The first trigger is the acquisition, and the second trigger is the founder or employee getting terminated by the acquirer without cause or good reason in a specified period (typically one year)

Employee Option Pool (EOP): stock that is reserved for existing and future employees to compensate, retain, and motivate workforce

Equity conversion terms: in the context of convertible notes, defines the specific event(s) that triggers conversion of debt to equity, the formula used during conversion (considering the impact of the valuation cap and/or discount – to be discussed), the type of equity received upon conversion by the note holder (common vs. preferred equity), and any associated rights the new equity holders will get after their convertible note is converted to equity (voting, dividends, etc).

Exclusivity: often referred to as a “no shop,” this provision locks parties into negotiating only with each other for a defined period (i.e., 30-60 days)

Exercise (options): buy options at the strike price

Full Ratchet Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward all the way the price of the shares issued in the new round. Full-Ratchet is the most investor friendly.

Fund Model: a forecasting exercise that a VC conducts to project what a successful fund will look like in terms of returns from each investment. VCs typically build a pathway to 3.0x net DPI

Indifference point: the price per share at which the noteholder or SAFE holder is indifferent between exercising the discount or valuation cap

Interest Rate & Payments: convertible notes often feature interest rates. Unlike a traditional loan, startups rarely pay the interest in cash to the convertible noteholder periodically. Instead, convertible notes accrue interest until the time of conversion.

Lead Investor: primary investor(s) (co-leads can exist) in a funding round that set terms and typically are writing the largest check(s); often take a board seat

Legally nonbinding: refers to the nature of term sheets. A signed term sheet does not legally mandate a deal be completed

Liquidation Preference: is one of the rights that makes preferred stock more valuable than common stock and a large part of why investors agree to purchase the right to preferred stock (i.e., SAFEs or convertible notes) or purchase preferred stock directly during financings. Liquidation preference is the legal entitlement to receive a pre-determined portion of a company’s value in the event of a sale or liquidity event before the holders of common stock (i.e. the right to get paid first in an exit).

Ownership (O): the % of a company a shareholder possesses prior to or post-closing of a financing

Participation (Liquidation Preferences): is the right of a preferred stock to participate in remaining acquisition proceeds (on an as-converted to common stock basis, along with common stock) after the initial multiplier liquidation preference is satisfied. When preferred stockholders have a participation preference it’s called “double dipping” as preferred stockholder enjoys preferential return of capital in liquidation preference and then enjoys pro rata share of remaining proceeds. Participation can be capped (limited to a certain multiple) or uncapped.

Prepayment: in the context of convertible notes, payment of the principal and accrued interest by the startup before the note matures. This is generally only allowed if there is a majority of supermajority vote in favor of prepayment by the noteholders.

Major Investor: refers to a participating investor in a financing that surpasses a certain check size threshold, unlocking certain rights. I.e., “all those who invest over $500k will be deemed major investors and shall receive information and pro rata rights”

Maturity: the date at which the debt (plus any accrued interest) is due for repayment. This is typically 12, 18, or 24 months from the issuance of the convertible note. We will talk about conversion momentarily but the norm for a convertible note is that it has converted into equity prior to the maturity date

Maturity Extension: in the context of convertible notes, this entails moving the maturity date back. A common alternative to repayment is for the company and noteholders to agree to an extension on the maturity date of the note

Multiple: a ratio that is calculated by dividing the valuation of an asset by a specific item on the financial statements

Multiplier (Liquidation Preferences): Multiplier refers to the multiple on the original price per share of a class or series of preferred stock an investor is entitled to receive before others get paid. A 1x preference means getting paid one times the original investment, a 3x preference would mean getting paid three times the original investment back before the next most senior preference is paid.

Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC): compares the value of an investment on the exit date to the initial equity contribution

Non-priced financing: financing round in which founder and VC do not explicitly set a share price and thus do not set an associated pre-money valuation (i.e., convertible notes, SAFEs)

Option pool: an amount of common stock primarily reserved in the cap table for future employees (in certain cases, options can be pulled out of the option pool for existing employees/founders as well)

Optional conversion: in the context of convertible notes, entitles the noteholder to convert their note into equity if desired if the note is still outstanding on the maturity date

Post-Money Valuation (PO): the valuation of the company after the round size is invested by the VC(s)

Pre-Money Valuation (PM): what the investor is valuing the company at TODAY, prior to the investment

Priced round/financing: a round of financing in which the valuation and price per share of a unit of stock being sold is officially determined (as opposed to a SAFE or convertible note in which case the valuation is left officially undetermined)

Price Per Share (PPS): the cost of acquiring a share of company x, typically determined by pre-money valuation and fully diluted shares outstanding prior to close of financing

Principal: in the context of convertible notes, the amount of investment provided by the noteholder (investor) to the company through the convertible note. In an unfortunate scenario where the note never converts to equity (we will discuss this), the principal (plus any accrued interest) is what the company owes the noteholder (unless nuanced legal terms dictate otherwise). Assuming the note does convert to equity (the norm), the principal (plus any accrued interest) is the quantity used to calculate how many shares the note holder will receive upon conversion into equity.

Pro rata rights: give investors the right (but not obligation) to participate in future rounds of financing to maintain their initial level of percentage ownership in the company.

Pro rata on a dollar-for-dollar basis: gives the investor the right to invest an amount equal to or less than the amount invested in their first round à VC Z invested 200K in the seed round and has the right to invest 200k in the Series A

Pro rata on a fixed sum basis: least common, investors get the right to continue investing an amount as agreed upon that is decoupled from the investment amount. VC Z, who invested $1M in a seed, negotiates pro rata rights up to $700K - they will be able to invest up to $700K in each subsequent round of financing.

Pro Rata ROFR: gives particular investor(s) the right to another investors voluntarily waived pro rata in a future financing  

Qualified financing: in the context of convertible notes/SAFEs, the round size of an equity financing typically must meet a certain dollar threshold to trigger conversion into equity.

QSBS: a tax benefit under Section 1202 that incentivizes investment into small businesses (often startups) with less than $50 million in aggregate gross asset value. Investors who purchase stock (common or preferred) directly (as opposed to via secondaries) from a c-corp business with less than $50 million in aggregate gross asset value and hold that investment for > 5 years, followed by a sale of the held stock, can avoid paying capital gains tax. The tax exclusion can be up to 100% of the gain, subject to limits: the greater of $10 million or 10x the original investment. Recently big beautiful bill updates: 1/ asset value threshold up to $75 million, 2/ cap limit extended to higher of $15 million or 10x investment, and 3/ exclusion starts to come into play after just three years (at 50% exclusion potential).

QSBS Gain Deferral: if you have to liquidate a position before the QSBS holding period requirement ends, you can defer the tax on capital gains, by reinvesting the gains into another QSBS qualified business within 60 days of liquidation. You also get to roll over the holding period of the original investment, continuing the clock (as opposed to starting over).

Repayment: in the context of convertible notes, the process of paying back the debt (plus any accrued interest) due to noteholders

Restricted Stock: company stock given to employees, usually as a bonus or additional compensation; does not have a strike price unlike options; usually awarded to company directors and executives and is subject to vesting

Round Size or Investment Amount (R): how much capital the founder is raising for the financing or VC round

RSUs: refers to an agreement by a company to issue employees shares on a future date. One RSU is the right to get one common share. RSUs, like options, are also subject to a time-based vesting schedule and can be trigger based; however, RSUs don’t have a strike price and are instead released directly to the recipient after vesting without any need to “exercise” or buy them; typically awarded to lower level employees than restricted stock

SAFE: an agreement between an investor and a company that converts into equity in the next financing round if certain conditions are met

Seniority (Liquidation Preferences): refers to whether preference is senior, junior or even (pari passu) with other preferred stock. Senior preference means having a first-tier liquidation right, junior preference means having a liquidation right that is paid after the senior preferred and pari passu means preference amongst different preferred stock is the same time.

Single-trigger: states that only one event must occur to accelerate the vesting of your equity. If the company is acquired, you gain complete ownership over all your options

Stock options: incentive mechanisms granted to employees, advisors, and consultants. Employees joining a VC-backed startup typically receive an option grant, which allows them to acquire company common shares in the future at a certain price by “exercising vested options”

Strike Price: the predetermined price an employee pays to exercise (aka purchase) their stock options and turn their stock options into actual shares of the company owned outright. Tax regulations (IRS Section 409a) require options grants to have a strike price equal to or above the fair market value of the underlying company stock on the date that the option is granted

‘Success disaster’: employees run the risk of being harmed financially for building a succeeding business that has grown in value significantly

Uncapped Note/SAFE: a convertible note (or SAFE) that lacks a valuation cap

Up Round: when the pre-money valuation of a future financing is higher than the post-money valuation of the prior financing; often seen as a positive sign for the company

Valuation: the process of deriving an enterprise value for a company

Valuation Cap: a valuation cap is an investor favorable terms that puts a ceiling on the conversion price at which a convertible note or SAFE would convert into the equity security sold at the qualified financing.

VC Valuation Method: a valuation methodology that entails projecting a company’s exit value in the future and a VC’s required MOIC in order to back into an implied valuation and ownership level at time of investment (starting with the future and backing into the present)

Vesting: the process of gaining ownership over granted stock options

Voluntary conversion: in the context of convertible notes, gives the investor (noteholder) the power to convert into equity whenever desired (even before maturity) under specified details, negating any prepayment potential

Warrants: when issued/contracted, give the warrant holder the right to buy a certain number of shares of the company’s common or preferred stock at a predefined price over a specified period

Weighted Average Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward to a value between the price originally paid by the protected investor and the price paid by the investors in the current (down) round.

PM + R = PO ➡️ the pre-money valuation plus the round size = the post-money valuation

PO – R = PM ➡️ the post-money valuation minus the round size = the pre-money valuation

PM / FDSO = PPS ➡️ the pre-money valuation divided by shares outstanding = price per share

R / PO = O ➡️ round size divided by the post-money valuation is the amount of ownership acquired in a financing by participating investors

D / PO = Daniel’s O ➡️ Daniel’s investment divided by the post-money valuation is the amount of ownership Daniel is acquiring in a financing

Fundraising

Rule #1: Communicate early and consistently. Goal: build long term relationships with a roster of investors before you kick off a process.

Rule #2: Ask for help. The only way to get maximal value out of your cap table is by asking for help. Especially when times are tough, great investors can potentially be the difference between make or break.

Rule #3: Keep knocking. As hard as it is, keep communicating with rejectors and make them aware of your progress.

Dont #1: OVER-FOMOing

Don’t #2: Focusing on who instead of what

Don’t #3: Exaggerating objectively “auditable” traction

Don’t #4: Asking for follow up intros from rejectors

Is there a topic you’d like us to cover? Don’t be a stranger! Ever want to dive deeper on a topic in VC Investing or Law?

We can be reached here:

Daniel Faierman ➡️ [email protected] 

Chuck Cotter ➡️ [email protected]

If you enjoyed this post, please share on LinkedIn, X (fka Twitter), Meta and elsewhere. It goes a long way to support us! If you didn’t, don’t be scared to unsubscribe (we appreciate honest feedback).

📢 Follow the Term Sheet Pitfalls authors on LinkedIn:

✍️ Written by Daniel Faierman and Chuck Cotter 

Disclaimer: The information provided in this entry does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal or investment advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available in this entry are for general informational purposes only.