Advisor Equity

Term Sheets Part XV: Structuring Advisor Packages

✋ Hello there! If you’re receiving this and are new to Term Sheet Pitfalls, you’re probably a founder, operator, investor, or friend who we think would enjoy this newsletter. Feel free to hit unsubscribe at the bottom if you have no interest in term sheet strategy, VC negotiation tactics, or fundraising guidance.

If you missed our last few posts, you can find them here:

If you were forwarded this newsletter, subscribe HERE

Our commitment to you: brief, simple, valuable content that will empower you to get smarter on VC term sheets and fundraising strategy.

We can be reached here:

Daniel Faierman ➡️ [email protected] 

Chuck Cotter ➡️ [email protected]

We recommend replying with a “hi” in order to ensure that future posts don’t end up in spam world or unsubscribing at the bottom at your preference (no hard feelings).

Daniel Faierman is a Partner at Habitat Partners, an NYC-based early stage VC firm focused on pre-seed to Series A investments in the consumer and software ecosystems. Learn more about Habitat Partners on their website. Daniel has invested in numerous startups and previously operated and invested at organizations including PepsiCo, AB InBev, VMG Partners, and Selva Ventures. Daniel was a former Yale tennis 🎾 player & completed his MBA at the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Chuck Cotter is a Partner in Morrison Foerster’s Emerging Company + Venture Capital practice group in Denver, with experience in the consumer products space, including food, beverage, personal care, beauty, and fashion. He has represented such companies and funds in over 200 🚀 consumer financing and M&A transactions. Chuck was a rugby player at Vassar College and completed his JD at Columbia Law School.

#KNICKSin5 ✅ ✅ - A big congrats to our numerous New York friends. It might be time to jump on the bandwagon. The energy in Manhattan was unlike anything I’ve ever seen last night. I’d guess there’s a greater portion of NYC people sleeping in today than maybe any other day of the year? Well deserved.

We took Term Sheet Pitfalls live at BevNet last week! If you’re a BevNet subscriber you’ll find the full panel recording here.

Daniel and Chuck @ BevNet Live: Term Sheets in the Trenches

Advisor Equity: What Founders Get Wrong and How To Get It Right

Advisor equity usually starts innocently. A founder meets someone with a useful network, strong operating experience, or a recognizable name. The person offers to help. Cash is tight, so the founder offers a small equity grant.

That can be perfectly reasonable. The problem is that advisor grants are often made before anyone has agreed on what the advisor will actually do, how long the relationship will last, or when the company can stop vesting if the advisor goes quiet.

Those details matter. By the time the company is raising a priced round, a few loose advisor arrangements can create awkward diligence questions, unnecessary cap table cleanup, credibility/sophistication concerns, and, in some cases, real legal issues.

The following details how founders should think about advisor equity before putting another name on the cap table. Below are the main topics that we will address:

  1. What is a Standard Equity Range?

  2. Approach to Advisor Equity Vesting

  3. Defining the Scope

  4. Proper Labeling (Advisor or Consultant)

  5. Advisor Equity in the context of Financing Diligence

  6. Common Mistakes

    1. Granting Too Much

    2. The Absence of Vesting

    3. Vagueness

    4. Using Advisor Equity to Close Investors

    5. Failing to Revisit Advisor Relationships

    6. Assuming Advisor Equity Actually Grants the Equity

WITH COVERAGE 🔥 🔥 

With Coverage is an incredible AI-enabled Risk Management Team replacing traditional insurance brokers. Their team of insurance experts analyze all of your existing insurance policies to identify savings and gaps in coverage… and instead of commissions, they offer a flat fee (= aligned incentives).

With Coverage has been supporting dozens of companies in our combined networks for a few years (and 700+ leading brands like Chomps, Hungryroot, Waterloo, and more).

BOTTOM LINE: Brands save up to 30% on their insurance straight to the bottom line while getting better coverage and service. Check out the 50+ testimonials on their website. One of our portcos saved $100k annualized straight to the bottom line.

They offer a free risk analysis of your policies up front. It doesn’t notify your broker or change your coverage. They just show you what they can do and present the findings.

REPLY “With Coverage” if you’d like a free savings audit - no brainer from our POV

(1) What is the standard range for Advisor Equity?

There is no single right number, but there is a market range.

For most early-stage startups, advisor grants typically fall between 0.1% and 0.5%. A basic advisor who takes occasional calls or provides light guidance will usually be at the lower end. An advisor who is meaningfully involved and/or makes high-value introductions or regular strategic support may justify something closer to the higher end.

Grants above 1% are rarely justified for an advisor. They are not impossible, but investors will ask questions, and the company should be prepared to explain exactly what the advisor is doing to earn that stake.

Stage matters. At the pre-seed or idea stage, a grant in the 0.25% to 0.5% range can make sense for a truly valuable advisor. At seed and beyond, advisor grants usually compress because the company’s equity is more valuable and expectations around equity compensation become more structured.

Strategic value matters. A recognizable name is not the same thing as a valuable advisor. A well-known operator who occasionally takes a call may be helpful, but that usually does not justify a large grant. The stronger case is an advisor who is making targeted customer introductions, helping recruit specific executives, advising on a difficult market entry, or repeatedly opening doors the founder could not open alone.

Time commitment matters. Monthly calls and light introductions generally belong at the lower end of the range. Weekly engagement, hands-on support, or sustained involvement may justify more. But at some point, if the company needs a defined amount of work from the person, the better answer may be to treat them as a consultant rather than an advisor.

Investment should be separated from advising. If the advisor is also writing a check, the investment should stand on its own. Advisory equity should be incremental, modest, and supported by actual advisory services.

Do not use advisor equity as a disguised investment sweetener. If the advisor is also investing, the investment economics should be documented as investment economics, and the advisory grant should be supported by real services. Otherwise, the company may create disclosure, pricing, or securities-law issues that are painful to explain later.

Advisor equity should generally be granted as stock options, not restricted stock. There are some exceptions, especially early on in the company’s journey. Check out our previous post on options mechanisms, restricted stock, etc.

(2) Advisor Equity Should Vest

One of the most common mistakes is copying employee vesting terms or, worse, granting the advisor’s equity upfront.

Advisor equity should vest. A typical structure is:

  • Vesting period: 2 years

  • Cliff: none, or a short 3- to 6-month cliff

  • Vesting cadence: monthly

That differs from the standard employee structure, which is typically 4-year vesting with a 1-year cliff.

The reason is simple: advisors are not employees. Their involvement is usually lighter, less predictable, and often more valuable early in the relationship. The equity should be earned as the advisor continues to provide services, not handed over in full based on good intentions at the outset.

The problems with poor vesting show up later. A company grants equity upfront, the advisor disappears, and the dead equity remains on the cap table. Or the advisor agreement lacks clear termination provisions, leaving the company with no clean way to stop vesting. Or the vesting schedule is so long that it no longer matches the commercial reality of the relationship.

Two years is often enough. If the advisor is still adding value after that, the company can revisit the arrangement.

The advisor agreement should clearly describe the vesting schedule, the services expected, the company’s termination right, and the treatment of unvested equity when the relationship ends. The advisor should also agree to standard confidentiality obligations and, where appropriate, invention assignment language.

(3) Define the Scope Before Granting Equity

“Be helpful when you can” is not a scope of work.

Before issuing equity, the company should be specific about what it expects. That does not require a 10-page agreement. In many cases, a focused paragraph is enough. But the company and the advisor should have a shared understanding of the basics:

  • How often will the advisor meet with the company?

  • How much time is expected?

  • What kind of help is the advisor expected to provide?

  • Will the advisor make introductions to customers, hires, investors, or commercial partners?

  • Are there any specific goals for the first 3 to 6 months?

This is not just a documentation exercise. It helps avoid the most common advisor problem: both sides think they are acting reasonably, but they have different expectations.

If the advisor goes quiet, the company should be able to terminate the agreement, stop vesting, and preserve the remaining unvested equity. That is much easier if the agreement says, from the beginning, that vesting depends on continued service.

In practice, founders often hesitate to terminate advisor arrangements, especially when the advisor is influential. That is understandable. It is also why expectation-setting matters. It is much easier to have the conversation upfront than to explain later why someone who has not helped in a year still owns part of the company.

We see this often: a founder grants equity to someone impressive, assumes the relationship will become useful, and then never revisits it. By the time the company is in financing diligence, the advisor is inactive, the grant is still sitting on the cap table, and everyone is trying to decide whether the cleanup is worth the awkward conversation.

(4) Advisor or Consultant? Use the Right Language

The harder question is sometimes whether the person is really an advisor at all.

An advisor relationship makes sense when the role is informal and intermittent. The advisor’s value comes from experience, judgment, pattern recognition, or network access. The company is not expecting guaranteed hours, a work product, or a particular deliverable by a particular date.

A consultant relationship is different. A consultant is appropriate when the company needs defined work: building a sales strategy, running a diligence process, managing a channel partnership project, conducting technical analysis, or producing some other concrete output. If the company needs accountability and consistent execution, the person is probably a consultant.

The compensation should follow the role.

An advisor usually receives a small equity grant and little or no cash. A consultant usually receives cash, or sometimes cash plus a small equity component. If equity is included in a consulting arrangement, the company should structure it carefully and make sure the services, compensation, and ownership of work product are clearly documented.

A useful test: if the company would be frustrated not knowing whether the work will get done, call the person a consultant, not an advisor.

(5) How Advisor Equity Looks in Financing Diligence

At pre-seed, a few small advisor grants usually will not create a problem. By the seed round or Series A, investors pay more attention.

In practice, the issue is rarely one properly documented 0.25% grant to a helpful advisor. The issue is the accumulation of loosely documented grants: several advisors, unclear scopes, no vesting, no termination mechanics, and no obvious current contribution.

Reasonable, structured advisor equity is usually fine. A total advisor pool of roughly 1% to 2% across all advisors is often explainable if the grants are supported by real services and appropriate vesting.

Messy or oversized advisor equity is different. If advisors collectively hold 3% or more, or if one advisor has an outsized stake with little explanation, investors will notice.

In diligence, investors tend to focus on:

  • total equity allocated to advisors;

  • whether grants were properly approved;

  • vesting terms;

  • whether any advisor owns an unusually large stake;

  • whether the advisors are still active; and

  • whether any advisory grant appears tied to an investment decision.

The concern is not just dilution. Sloppy advisor arrangements can suggest that the founders do not fully appreciate the value of the company’s equity or are not managing the cap table carefully. That is not the signal a company wants to send when asking new investors to come in.

The worst-case outcome is being asked to clean up the advisor arrangements before closing the round. That can mean difficult conversations, amendments, cancellations, repricings, or other restructuring at exactly the wrong time.

(6) Common Mistakes

A. Granting too much, too early

Advisor equity feels cheap at the idea stage. It will not feel cheap later if the advisor has not helped in a year and the company has gone through multiple rounds of dilution.

Founders should be especially careful about granting large percentages before there is a clear role, a clear time commitment, and a clear reason the advisor deserves meaningful ownership.

B. Granting Equity Without Vesting

No vesting means the advisor can receive the full benefit even if the relationship ends quickly. That creates dead equity and gives the company little leverage if the advisor disengages.

Advisor equity should generally vest over time and stop vesting when the services stop.

C. Leaving Expectations Vague

Vague expectations create predictable friction. The advisor thinks they are helping. The founder feels disappointed. No one can point to what was actually promised.

A short, specific scope is better than a broad statement that the advisor will “provide strategic advice.”

D. Using Advisor Equity to Close Investors

Advisor equity should not be used to hide better investment economics. If a person is investing, treat the investment as an investment. If the person is advising, compensate them for advising. Blurring those lines can complicate future financings and create legal issues.

E. Failing to Revisit Advisor Relationships

What made sense at pre-seed may not make sense at Series A. The company’s needs change. The advisor’s relevance may change. The advisor’s availability may change.

Companies should periodically review advisor arrangements and terminate relationships that are no longer active. That is not punitive; it is basic cap table hygiene.

F. Assuming an advisor agreement actually grants the equity

A promise of equity in an advisor agreement does not, by itself, mean the equity has been granted.

Equity grants generally require board approval and a separate equity award agreement. The advisor agreement should usually provide that the company will recommend that the board approve an equity award, with an exercise price equal to the fair market value on the date of grant.

If the company forgets to obtain board approval and formally issue the award, the mistake often surfaces later in diligence. By then, the company’s valuation may have increased, the option exercise price may be higher, and the advisor may lose out on value they expected to receive.

This is avoidable. Get the board approval. Issue the award agreement. Keep the records clean.

The Bottom Line

Advisor equity is not just a cheap substitute for cash. It is a cap table decision.

Start small. Define the role. Use vesting. Make sure the company can stop vesting when the services stop. Do not promise more equity than the advisor’s actual contribution can justify.

If you can explain each advisor grant clearly in financing diligence, the structure is probably defensible. If you cannot, fix it before someone else asks.

If you enjoyed this article, feel free to view recent prior articles:

Ongoing Term Glossary

Anti-Dilution Rights: offer investors protection against dilution in unfavorable financing rounds. This term is usually not contentious from a negotiation perspective between founder and investor - in fact, studies have founds that 92-95% of preferred stock financings include some form of anti-dilution protection.

Authorized shares: the MAX number of shares of each class a company can issue without further shareholder approval.

Automatic Conversion: in the context of convertible notes (or SAFEs), a clause that triggers a convertible note to automatically convert into equity at maturity.

Board of directors: a group of individuals that represent sharesholders in major corporate decisions. A critical responsibility is the oversight of management - simply, the ability to fire of hire the CEO. Other board activities include assesing company performance, providing strategic guidance, developing corporate policy, approving budgets, options plans, mergers/IPOs, and fundraising.

Bridge Financing: when investors agree to provide temporary financing to secure a company’s cash balance before the company raises their next priced round - aka the bridge that gets you to your next priced round.

Capped Price: conversion price per share awarded to noteholder (or SAFE holder) if investor exercises valuation cap

Change in control: a significant shift in the ownership or control of a company, often triggering specific rights or obligations for investors (M&A most commonly)

Clawback provisions: provisions that give the company the right to buy back vested shares at the original issue price or at fair market value after dismissing an employee under defined circumstances (leaving for a competitor, severe misconduct, etc)

Co-Invest: triggered when a fund raises “one-off” new capital from LPs/investors (as opposed to pulling from existing permanent fund) to unlock ability to execute an investment; associated management fees and carry (if any) typically flow back to the fund or individual who raised the co-invest capital. Funds often give major LPs prioritized “co-invest“ rights, which gives such LPs the first rights to participate in the co-invest opportunity before others.

Comparable Company Analysis: a valuation methodology that entails identifying comparable companies and transactions to the company being valued as a means of deriving multiples that can be used to generate a landed valuation

Confidentiality: prevents the startup from disclosing the terms of a term sheet to outside parties (i.e., other investors, startups). This enables both parties to negotiate in good faith.

Convertible Note: a debt instrument that can be converted to equity based on the occurrence of certain events (most commonly during a priced equity financing round).

Conversion: convertible notes (and SAFEs) automatically convert into equity if certain triggers occur. The most common trigger that leads to the conversion of a convertible note (or SAFE) into equity is a priced equity financing round

Corporate governance: a set of principles and mechanisms that balances the interests of company stakeholders (not only shareholders but also employees, customers, suppliers, etc) and affects control over company decision-making

Co-Sale: the inverse of ROFR by nature; if a founder sells shares, the investors will have the opportunity to sell a proportional amount of their stock as well.

Cumulative dividends: accrue value and must be paid to investors upon a liquidity event (even if not declared), acting like a debt-like liability that increases investor returns (not that different from accruing interest on the value of an investment via convertible note before it converts)

Debt repayment terms: in the context of convertible notes, defines specifics associated with principal, interest rate, maturity date, and default provisions.

Definitive documents:  the legal contracts between the investors and the company that detail the terms of the transaction and are drafted by a lawyer

Dilution (D): losing a portion of your ownership as the company sells equity to investors

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF): a valuation methodology that entails forecasting the future cash flows of a business and discounting the cash flows by a determined cost of capital to derive an enterprise value

Discount: a discount is a term awarded to the convertible noteholder (or SAFE holder) that drives a reduction in the conversion price per share that they are awarded during a qualified financing. Discounts typically range from 10-30% with 20% being the most common.

Dividend Recap: a company borrows new money by issuing debt and uses the proceeds from the debt to pay a one time special dividend to shareholders after board approval. The idea is that the company has a strong enough cash flow dynamic to make interest and principal payments in the future

Down Round: when the pre-money valuation of a future financing is lower than the post-money valuation of the prior financing; often seen as a negative sign for the company

Double-trigger: requires two events to occur to accelerate the completion of your vesting. The first trigger is the acquisition, and the second trigger is the founder or employee getting terminated by the acquirer without cause or good reason in a specified period (typically one year)

Drag-Along Rights: in short, drag along rights enable majority shareholders often including VCs to force minority shareholders to participate in the sale of a company on the same terms. Minority shareholders are “dragged along” disabling them from holding out on a deal to try to get something better for themselves.

Employee Option Pool (EOP): stock that is reserved for existing and future employees to compensate, retain, and motivate workforce

Equity conversion terms: in the context of convertible notes, defines the specific event(s) that triggers conversion of debt to equity, the formula used during conversion (considering the impact of the valuation cap and/or discount – to be discussed), the type of equity received upon conversion by the note holder (common vs. preferred equity), and any associated rights the new equity holders will get after their convertible note is converted to equity (voting, dividends, etc).

Exclusivity: often referred to as a “no shop,” this provision locks parties into negotiating only with each other for a defined period (i.e., 30-60 days)

Exercise (options): buy options at the strike price

Full Ratchet Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward all the way the price of the shares issued in the new round. Full-Ratchet is the most investor friendly.

Fund Model: a forecasting exercise that a VC conducts to project what a successful fund will look like in terms of returns from each investment. VCs typically build a pathway to 3.0x net DPI

Indifference point: the price per share at which the noteholder or SAFE holder is indifferent between exercising the discount or valuation cap

Interest Rate & Payments: convertible notes often feature interest rates. Unlike a traditional loan, startups rarely pay the interest in cash to the convertible noteholder periodically. Instead, convertible notes accrue interest until the time of conversion.

Issued Shares: those that the company has issues to shareholders; can’t be greater than the number of shares authorized to be issued for that class

Lead Investor: primary investor(s) (co-leads can exist) in a funding round that set terms and typically are writing the largest check(s); often take a board seat

Legally nonbinding: refers to the nature of term sheets. A signed term sheet does not legally mandate a deal be completed

Liquidation Preference: is one of the rights that makes preferred stock more valuable than common stock and a large part of why investors agree to purchase the right to preferred stock (i.e., SAFEs or convertible notes) or purchase preferred stock directly during financings. Liquidation preference is the legal entitlement to receive a pre-determined portion of a company’s value in the event of a sale or liquidity event before the holders of common stock (i.e. the right to get paid first in an exit).

Major Investor: refers to a participating investor in a financing that surpasses a certain check size threshold, unlocking certain rights. I.e., “all those who invest over $500k will be deemed major investors and shall receive information and pro rata rights”

Maturity: the date at which the debt (plus any accrued interest) is due for repayment. This is typically 12, 18, or 24 months from the issuance of the convertible note. We will talk about conversion momentarily but the norm for a convertible note is that it has converted into equity prior to the maturity date

Maturity Extension: in the context of convertible notes, this entails moving the maturity date back. A common alternative to repayment is for the company and noteholders to agree to an extension on the maturity date of the note

Multiple: a ratio that is calculated by dividing the valuation of an asset by a specific item on the financial statements

Multiplier (Liquidation Preferences): Multiplier refers to the multiple on the original price per share of a class or series of preferred stock an investor is entitled to receive before others get paid. A 1x preference means getting paid one times the original investment, a 3x preference would mean getting paid three times the original investment back before the next most senior preference is paid.

Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC): compares the value of an investment on the exit date to the initial equity contribution

Non-cumulative dividends only pay if declared by the board (thus do not accrue)

Non-priced financing: financing round in which founder and VC do not explicitly set a share price and thus do not set an associated pre-money valuation (i.e., convertible notes, SAFEs)

Option pool: an amount of common stock primarily reserved in the cap table for future employees (in certain cases, options can be pulled out of the option pool for existing employees/founders as well)

Optional conversion: in the context of convertible notes, entitles the noteholder to convert their note into equity if desired if the note is still outstanding on the maturity date.

Oustanding Shares: shares owned by shareholders such as investors or employees (could be in process of vesting).

Ownership (O): the % of a company a shareholder possesses prior to or post-closing of a financing.

Participation (Liquidation Preferences): is the right of a preferred stock to participate in remaining acquisition proceeds (on an as-converted to common stock basis, along with common stock) after the initial multiplier liquidation preference is satisfied. When preferred stockholders have a participation preference it’s called “double dipping” as preferred stockholder enjoys preferential return of capital in liquidation preference and then enjoys pro rata share of remaining proceeds. Participation can be capped (limited to a certain multiple) or uncapped.

Prepayment: in the context of convertible notes, payment of the principal and accrued interest by the startup before the note matures. This is generally only allowed if there is a majority of supermajority vote in favor of prepayment by the noteholders.

Post-Money Valuation (PO): the valuation of the company after the round size is invested by the VC(s)

Pre-Money Valuation (PM): what the investor is valuing the company at TODAY, prior to the investment

Priced round/financing: a round of financing in which the valuation and price per share of a unit of stock being sold is officially determined (as opposed to a SAFE or convertible note in which case the valuation is left officially undetermined)

Price Per Share (PPS): the cost of acquiring a share of company x, typically determined by pre-money valuation and fully diluted shares outstanding prior to close of financing

Primary transaction: is when the company (the “issuer”) sells shares for the first time to investors. Primary issuances must comply with U.S. securities laws — meaning they must either be registered or qualify for an exemption.

Principal: in the context of convertible notes, the amount of investment provided by the noteholder (investor) to the company through the convertible note. In an unfortunate scenario where the note never converts to equity (we will discuss this), the principal (plus any accrued interest) is what the company owes the noteholder (unless nuanced legal terms dictate otherwise). Assuming the note does convert to equity (the norm), the principal (plus any accrued interest) is the quantity used to calculate how many shares the note holder will receive upon conversion into equity.

Pro rata rights: give investors the right (but not obligation) to participate in future rounds of financing to maintain their initial level of percentage ownership in the company.

Pro rata on a dollar-for-dollar basis: gives the investor the right to invest an amount equal to or less than the amount invested in their first round à VC Z invested 200K in the seed round and has the right to invest 200k in the Series A

Pro rata on a fixed sum basis: least common, investors get the right to continue investing an amount as agreed upon that is decoupled from the investment amount. VC Z, who invested $1M in a seed, negotiates pro rata rights up to $700K - they will be able to invest up to $700K in each subsequent round of financing.

Pro Rata ROFR: gives particular investor(s) the right to another investors voluntarily waived pro rata in a future financing  

Protective provisions (negative controls) are contractual clauses that have the goal of preventing the company and its shareholders from taking actions without getting explicit consent of the investors protected by the provisions. They effectively are veto rights that investors (preferred shareholders) have on actions so that they are protected against expropriation.

Qualified financing: in the context of convertible notes/SAFEs, the round size of an equity financing typically must meet a certain dollar threshold to trigger conversion into equity.

QSBS: a tax benefit under Section 1202 that incentivizes investment into small businesses (often startups) with less than $50 million in aggregate gross asset value. Investors who purchase stock (common or preferred) directly (as opposed to via secondaries) from a c-corp business with less than $50 million in aggregate gross asset value and hold that investment for > 5 years, followed by a sale of the held stock, can avoid paying capital gains tax. The tax exclusion can be up to 100% of the gain, subject to limits: the greater of $10 million or 10x the original investment. Recently big beautiful bill updates: 1/ asset value threshold up to $75 million, 2/ cap limit extended to higher of $15 million or 10x investment, and 3/ exclusion starts to come into play after just three years (at 50% exclusion potential).

QSBS Gain Deferral: if you have to liquidate a position before the QSBS holding period requirement ends, you can defer the tax on capital gains, by reinvesting the gains into another QSBS qualified business within 60 days of liquidation. You also get to roll over the holding period of the original investment, continuing the clock (as opposed to starting over).

Redemption rights: allow the investor to sell their shares back to the company for a guaranteed return (often at the original puchase price), granting them a guaranteed exit/liquidity path no matter what.

Registration Rights: defines the circumstances in which investors can require the company to register its shares or piggyback on a registration of other classes of stock.

Repayment: in the context of convertible notes, the process of paying back the debt (plus any accrued interest) due to noteholders

Restricted Stock: company stock given to employees, usually as a bonus or additional compensation; does not have a strike price unlike options; usually awarded to company directors and executives and is subject to vesting

ROFR: gives existing shareholders the first chance to buy shares from an existing shareholder who is attempting to sell them to an outside third party. In simple terms, if I want to sell my shares in a startup as a founder or investor, I need to give existing company shareholders the right to purchase my stock at the agreed upon price with the third party first

Round Size or Investment Amount (R): how much capital the founder is raising for the financing or VC round

RSUs: refers to an agreement by a company to issue employees shares on a future date. One RSU is the right to get one common share. RSUs, like options, are also subject to a time-based vesting schedule and can be trigger based; however, RSUs don’t have a strike price and are instead released directly to the recipient after vesting without any need to “exercise” or buy them; typically awarded to lower level employees than restricted stock

SAFE: an agreement between an investor and a company that converts into equity in the next financing round if certain conditions are met

Secondary Transaction: the resale of existing shares by a current stockholder. A secondary occurs either: when the company buys back the shares (a redemption), or when a stockholder sells their shares to a third party (a transfer). Secondaries are also subject to securities rules, but the requirements are generally lighter for non-affiliated stockholders — especially in true peer-to-peer sales.

Seniority (Liquidation Preferences): refers to whether preference is senior, junior or even (pari passu) with other preferred stock. Senior preference means having a first-tier liquidation right, junior preference means having a liquidation right that is paid after the senior preferred and pari passu means preference amongst different preferred stock is the same time.

Single-trigger: states that only one event must occur to accelerate the vesting of your equity. If the company is acquired, you gain complete ownership over all your options

Stock options: incentive mechanisms granted to employees, advisors, and consultants. Employees joining a VC-backed startup typically receive an option grant, which allows them to acquire company common shares in the future at a certain price by “exercising vested options”

Strike Price: the predetermined price an employee pays to exercise (aka purchase) their stock options and turn their stock options into actual shares of the company owned outright. Tax regulations (IRS Section 409a) require options grants to have a strike price equal to or above the fair market value of the underlying company stock on the date that the option is granted

‘Success disaster’: employees run the risk of being harmed financially for building a succeeding business that has grown in value significantly

Supermajority: require votes in excess of the majority; frequenty established in the charter and typically only apply to certain scenarios / investor classes. Supermajority thresholds are often set to give a minority investor veto power.

Supervoting: Supervoting shares entails one class of shares having more votes than another voting class of shares. It distances cash flow and voting rights from each other. In the VC industry supervoting has been heavily debated as companies with supervoting like Theranos, Uber, and WeWork have encountered governance controversies. Founders are typically the beneficiaries (for better or worse) as their voting power becomes a multiple (like 10x) of their share count.

Tag-Along Rights: tag-along rights are triggered when the majority shareholders decide to sell the company. In a similar but opposite nature to Drag-Along, Tag-Along protects minority shareholder’s right to exit alongside the majority. While drag-along “forces” the minority to sell, tag-along allows the minority to sell on the same terms as the majority so they are not left behind

Tender Offer: is a proposal by a buyer (often an investor or the company itself) to purchase shares from multiple stockholders during a set time window and at a set price.

Uncapped Note/SAFE: a convertible note (or SAFE) that lacks a valuation cap

Up Round: when the pre-money valuation of a future financing is higher than the post-money valuation of the prior financing; often seen as a positive sign for the company

Valuation: the process of deriving an enterprise value for a company

Valuation Cap: a valuation cap is an investor favorable terms that puts a ceiling on the conversion price at which a convertible note or SAFE would convert into the equity security sold at the qualified financing.

VC Valuation Method: a valuation methodology that entails projecting a company’s exit value in the future and a VC’s required MOIC in order to back into an implied valuation and ownership level at time of investment (starting with the future and backing into the present)

Vesting: the process of gaining ownership over granted stock options

Voluntary conversion: in the context of convertible notes, gives the investor (noteholder) the power to convert into equity whenever desired (even before maturity) under specified details, negating any prepayment potential

Warrants: when issued/contracted, give the warrant holder the right to buy a certain number of shares of the company’s common or preferred stock at a predefined price over a specified period

Weighted Average Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward to a value between the price originally paid by the protected investor and the price paid by the investors in the current (down) round.

PM + R = PO ➡️ the pre-money valuation plus the round size = the post-money valuation

PO – R = PM ➡️ the post-money valuation minus the round size = the pre-money valuation

PM / FDSO = PPS ➡️ the pre-money valuation divided by shares outstanding = price per share

R / PO = O ➡️ round size divided by the post-money valuation is the amount of ownership acquired in a financing by participating investors

D / PO = Daniel’s O ➡️ Daniel’s investment divided by the post-money valuation is the amount of ownership Daniel is acquiring in a financing

Fundraising

Rule #1: Communicate early and consistently. Goal: build long term relationships with a roster of investors before you kick off a process.

Rule #2: Ask for help. The only way to get maximal value out of your cap table is by asking for help. Especially when times are tough, great investors can potentially be the difference between make or break.

Rule #3: Keep knocking. As hard as it is, keep communicating with rejectors and make them aware of your progress.

Dont #1: OVER-FOMOing

Don’t #2: Focusing on who instead of what

Don’t #3: Exaggerating objectively “auditable” traction

Don’t #4: Asking for follow up intros from rejectors

Is there a topic you’d like us to cover? Don’t be a stranger! Ever want to dive deeper on a topic in VC Investing or Law?

We can be reached here:

Daniel Faierman ➡️ [email protected] 

Chuck Cotter ➡️ [email protected]

If you enjoyed this post, please share on LinkedIn, X (fka Twitter), Meta and elsewhere. It goes a long way to support us! If you didn’t, don’t be scared to unsubscribe (we appreciate honest feedback).

📢 Follow the Term Sheet Pitfalls authors on LinkedIn:

✍️ Written by Daniel Faierman and Chuck Cotter 

Disclaimer: The information provided in this entry does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal or investment advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available in this entry are for general informational purposes only.