- Term Sheet Pitfalls
- Posts
- More Dividends (and Dividend Recaps?)
More Dividends (and Dividend Recaps?)
Term Sheets Part XII: Liquidity Solutions in VC


✋ Hello there! Thanks so much for giving Term Sheet Pitfalls a shot! If you’re receiving this, you’re a founder, operator, investor, or friend who we think would enjoy this newsletter. If you missed our last few posts, you can find them here:
If you were forwarded this newsletter, subscribe HERE
Our commitment to you: brief, simple, valuable content that will empower you to get smarter on VC term sheets and fundraising strategy.
We can be reached here:
Daniel Faierman ➡️ [email protected]
Chuck Cotter ➡️ [email protected]
We recommend replying with a “hi” in order to ensure that future posts don’t end up in spam world or unsubscribing at the bottom at your preference (no hard feelings).
![]() | Daniel Faierman is a Partner at Habitat Partners, an NYC-based early stage VC firm focused on pre-seed to Series A investments in the consumer and software ecosystems. Learn more about Habitat Partners on their website or notion page. Daniel has invested in numerous startups and previously operated and invested at organizations including PepsiCo, AB InBev, VMG Partners, and Selva Ventures. Daniel was a former Yale tennis 🎾 player & completed his MBA at the Stanford Graduate School of Business. |
![]() | Chuck Cotter is a Partner in Morrison Foerster’s Emerging Company + Venture Capital practice group in Denver, with experience in the consumer products space, including food, beverage, personal care, beauty, and fashion. He has represented such companies and funds in over 200 🚀 consumer financing and M&A transactions. Chuck was a rugby player at Vassar College and completed his JD at Columbia Law School. |
WITH COVERAGE 🔥 🔥
Excited to announce our new partnership with With Coverage (WC), a partner that has been supporting dozens of companies in our combined networks for a few years (and 700+ leading brands like Chomps, Hungryroot, Waterloo, and more).
Neither of us are early investors in With Coverage, which is unfortunate because they just announced their $42M raise led by Sequoia and Khosla.
With Coverage is an incredible AI-enabled Risk Management Team replacing traditional insurance brokers. Their team of insurance experts analyze all of your exisiting insurance policies to identify savings and gaps in coverage… and instead of commissions, they offer a flat fee (= aligned incentives).
BOTTOM LINE: Brands save up to 30% on their insurance straight to the bottom line while getting better coverage and service. Check out the 50+ testimonials on their website. One of our portcos saved $100k annualized straight to the bottom line.
They offer a free risk analysis of your policies up front. It doesn’t notify your broker or change your coverage. They just show you what they can do and present the findings.
REPLY “With Coverage” if you’d like a free savings audit - no brainer from our POV
A few months ago we shared a post that touched on some of the fundamental liquidity challenges the venture asset class is facing. For a refresher, VC distribution levels to LPs as a % of NAV remains historically low, despite improvement:

Recapping some of the latest data from SVB’s 2025 State of the Markets, we get a renewed (but not super novel) POV for why DPI is still lagging:
(1) IPOs: bigger, slower, mixed performance
IPO activity picked up in 2025 with over 340 IPOs (good!)
… but recent IPO companies on average are bigger in terms of revenue size and slower growth compared to prior generations
Stock performance post-IPO is mixed but mostly negative, with many companies seeing down valuations compared to their most recent private marking
Underwriting fees can consume 4-7% of the float
Implication: with an abundance of late stage private capital, volatile stock performance, and pressure to be bigger/more durable, many companies are choosing to stay private longer

(2) M&A
In 2025 there was a slight uptick in M&A compared to 2023/2024 as AI unicorns are buying to scale
Levels remain compressed compared to longer term historical levels
Just 7% of deals were sold for a known price at least 3x higher than the total amount of VC raised. That’s down from 22% seeing a favorable outcome in 2021
Implication: a smaller portion of M&A deals are generating even modest VC returns

Taking the data above, it’s no surprise liquidity/DPI challenges exist for many VCs.
How should founders and VCs find liquidity in 2026 and beyond?
For today’s post we will put secondaries/tender offers (see our recent post here; we’re bullish) and splashy M&A/IPOs aside (given the aforementioned challenges above make M&A/IPO outcomes rare) and share why we forsee dividends and maybe even dividend recaps gaining momentum over the next few years.
The Backdrop
Since mid-2021 (peak ZIRP era), more companies have hunkered down and turned profitable but more companies have also stopped growing. We’ve seen more stabilization and less acceleration (especially non-AI companies) in the case of many assets.

“Private equity firms are struggling to sell the software companies they acquired in a buying frenzy in 2021 and 2022…
Worries that older software firms are getting sidelined by new AI startups are making it harder for PE firms to list or sell their companies, according to some PE investors and their bankers.”
While the quote above calls out private equity and software specifically, this dynamic also holds true across VC-backed assets within a wide array of verticals (consumer, hardware, etc) commonly referred to as “zombie assets.”
To give a directional example of a VC zombie asset:
‘22: $150M NR (+10% vs.LY), 12% EBITDA Margin, solid year
‘23: $135M NR (-10% vs. LY), 16% EBITDA Margin, rationalized weak SKU/channels
‘24: $136M NR (flat), 18% EBITDA Margin, flatlining but keeping costs in check
‘25: $130M NR (-5% vs. LY), 20% EBITDA Margin, flatlining but improving costs
VMS company raised $15M in lifetime VC in primaries from 2018-2021; company has made a few attempts to invest retained earnings into growth initiatives but has also built up a robust cash balance from ‘22 to ‘25
Company attempted sell-side M&A process in early 2022 but failed and also can no longer attract secondaries given flatlining growth
VCs/Preferred own 70% of the company (22% owned by Series B, 19% owned by Series A, 16% owned by Seed, 13% owned by Pre-Seed) while the founder owns 20% and employees own 10%
Commentary: taking EBITDA as a proxy for cash flow, this business has a very strong cash flow dynamic despite growth challenges and certainly isn’t going to become insolvent any time soon…. BUT the VCs involved (especially those that invested 6+ years ago) want liquidity and the original founders also wouldn’t mind cashing out in some capacity after years of grinding.
So for an asset that can’t IPO, get acquired, attract secondaries, or return to robust growth despite possessing strong EBITDA/cash flow dynamics, what is the path forward?
Dividends or maybe even a dividend recap! That dividend clause you quickly skimmed over in the seed round term sheet might now come in handy.
Dividend Basics in VC
We’ve covered many aspects of term sheets throughout TSP but neglected to discuss dividends until today.
ChatGPT estimates just ~1-5% of VC-backed companies declare cash dividends while still private.
Carta/Pitchbook data show that even downside-protective features like cumulative (will explain) dividends appear in only ~3-6% of early stage financings and typically in the form of non-cash accrual based dividends not cash distributions.
Thus we didn’t view this topic as a focus point when running through term sheet basics in the early days of TSP. Dividends are historically rare because VCs typically underwrite to traditional liquidity events such as M&A/IPO. Most of their portfolio companies die, have a distressed M&A outcome (all-stock, acqui-hire, or basically a $0 EV), or exit successfully via M&A/IPO/Secondaries. While private equity dudes/dudettes love dividends, VCs typically don’t fight for dividends unless they are at a stage where downside protection is a major focus even beyond the basic liquidation preference.
However, as we discussed above, the “cash flow healthy” but stagnant zombie asset is becoming more prevalent and we believe dividends should/will be used more often in the future. This is especially true in consumer where profitability on average is reached earlier on than high-flying technology companies that may still be deliberately far from profitability after years of growth and multiple sizable capital raises.
What are dividends and how do they work in a traditional term sheet?
In the case of traditional public stock dividends, a quantity is paid out of a company’s generated net income to shareholders for each share the respective shareholder owns. A dividend clause in a typical VC term sheet reads:
“Dividends: The holders of the Series B preferred shall be entitled to receive non-cumulative dividends in preference to any dividends on the common stock at the rate of 10% of the original purchase price per annum when and as declared by the board of directors. The holders of Series B stock shall also have the right to participate pro rata in any dividends paid on the common stock on an as-if-converted basis.”
Non-cumulative vs. cumulative:
Cumulative dividends accrue value and must be paid to investors upon a liquidity event (even if not declared), acting like a debt-like liability that increases investor returns (not that different from accruing interest on the value of an investment via convertible note before it converts)
Non-cumulative dividends only pay if declared by the board (thus do not accrue).
IMPORTANT CALL OUT: In standard VC terms, cumulative dividends accrue only on the preferred’s liquidation preference, not on the common “as‑converted” value, unless the term sheet explicitly says otherwise. If the investor takes their preference at exit, they get: liquidation preference (e.g., 1x or 2x) plus accrued cumulative dividends calculated on that preference base. If they convert to common (e.g., for a big IPO or large M&A), cumulative dividends are often waived or simply not paid, and the investor just takes their common-as-converted value.
If they convert to common (e.g., for a big IPO or large M&A), cumulative dividends are often waived or simply not paid, and the investor just takes their common-as-converted value
In early stage deals (Series B and earlier), non-cumulative is the default; cumulative is quite rare and would be a unique circumstance (ask your lawyer if this pops up). After all, potentially declaring a dividend on an early stage company with limited cash flow (likely negative cash flow) could drive insolvency! Cumulative is more common in late stage deals (~20-25% of the time we’d estimate).
“As declared by the board”
Ultimately the default is for the board to control when dividends are declared because they should have the “best interest of all shareholders” in mind and wouldn’t want to sink a company by forcing it to drain cash balances in order to pay cash dividends.
As a founder, it’s important to ensure that dividends are set to be approved by a majority (or even supermajority).
By default dividend clauses in early stage VC deals are written in a way such that dividends will not not generally serve as a pathway for a venture-like outcome for investors.
For example, let’s say a VC leading a Series A with a $10M investment (at a $100M post-money valuation with a standard 1x non-participating senior liquidation preference) negotiates hard and convinces an inexperienced founder to agree to an 8% cumulative annual dividend that doesn’t compound. In other words the VC juices his investment by accruing $800k every year. Let’s say the company performs well and the VC achieves a 25x return 5 years later at exit. That outcome with dividends equates to $254M in value (25.4x) vs. $250M (25.0x) without dividends. Not a big difference (a 2% better return with dividends). Further, this scenario assumes the term sheet is written in a way that empowers the VC to get the cumulative dividend benefit even if the VC converts to common at exit.
However, in a downside scenario the difference can be material. Let’s say the same company is sold after 5 years for $20M. The VC exercises their liquidation preference ($10M) and also receives $4M in dividend proceeds on top (a 40% higher return than only exercising the liquidation preference). Further, the dividends and liquidation preference sit senior to the common.
One Time Special Dividends:
Putting all the above aside, let’s return back to our VC zombie asset example above. Let’s imagine at the end of 2022 the company/board decides that they are not a great exit or secondaries candidate. The strategy agreed upon is to retain as much cash as possible in 2023-2025 (cutting where possible and funding mandatory growth initiatives only) and issue a “one-time special dividend” as declared by the board paid through a legally available created surplus.
In this case, the special dividend is not tied to any preferred dividend clause benefitting the preferred only in historical term sheets. Further, historical term sheets state that any dividends going to the common trigger that the preferred are treated as if converted to common on a pro rata basis.
The company has $12M on the balance sheet at the end of 2022 and adds:
~$17M in 2023 ($135 × 16% (using EBITDA as a proxy for cash flow margin) x 80% retention of cash for dividends).
~$20M in 2024 ($136 × 18% x 80%)
~$21M in 2025 ($130 × 20% x 80%)
Total cash on balance sheet by end of 2025 = $70M
Assuming the company wants to keep a minimum of $7M on the balance sheet out of caution, the company is left with $63M it can issue to common and preferred shareholders in a special dividend:
The preferred who own 70% of the business will be given $44M in dividends (~3x the total capital invested into the company)
The common will be left with $19M (~$13M to the founder, not bad at all!).
This exercise can be repeated annually as the company continues to generate cash flow and sustain “healthy” VC zombie status. This is the power of dividends. While they may not solve for a venture-esque outcome, dividends can get investors and founders more than whole, enabling VCs to put some needed DPI on the scoreboard (out of their zombie assets) while providing a founder with material wealth.
We’d be ignorant to not establish that the VC zombie example above is particularly healthy cash flow wise - such a standard is no easy feat to sustain (as growth turns off). But the takeaway is that one time special dividends for cash flow generative assets that are stuck in “no-mans land” can be a creative solution for VC DPI and founder wealth accumulation.
Dividend Recaps
Instead of building up cash reserves over a three year period for a one time special dividend, an accelerated path to material liquidity could be the use of a dividend recapitalization (at the end of 2022 in the case of the example zombie asset) once the board decides that an exit or secondaries are off the table despite solid cash flow dynamics.
Full transparency, we have minimal experience with dividend recaps in practice but in layman terms, a company borrows new money by issuing debt and uses the proceeds from the debt to pay a one time special dividend to shareholders. The idea is that the company has a strong enough cash flow dynamic to make interest and principal payments in the future. Recaps require board approval and typically investor consent. While bylaws rarely change, rights agreements often do as lenders permanently alter control dynamics.
Imagine that at the end of 2022, the example VC zombie asset above went for a dividend recap instead of preserving cash for three years to fund a 2026 dividend.
Assuming a lender was willing to lend at 3x 2022 EBITDA, $54M in cash ($150M × 12% EBITDA Margin x 3) would have been unlocked for dividends (a little less than the $63M we released in the dividend example above, but a three years earlier disbursement in the case of the recap!). Of course, the asset would be left with $54M in debt though.
Benefits of a dividend recap (instead of dividends):
1/ Speed and magnitude of cash: recaps use borrowed capital and can return multiple years of future cash flow today and meaningfully move DPI for VCs now
2/ Time value of money: for a VC, returning money today reduces j-curve pain, improves IRR, and could lead to recycling of capital.
3/ Capital structure signaling: reframes the payout as capital structure optimization as you are keeping operating cash flow reinvestable going forward after making debt payments. This could better preserve optionality for a future sale if a growth opportunity opens up that reinvigorates the business.
Benefits of dividends (instead of a recap)
1/ No debt! Recaps = debt = more fragility
2/ With recaps, mistakes or bad performance can be extremely unforgiving as defaulting or breaking a covenant could lead to insolvency (not the case with dividends)
There are many considerations in the context of a dividend recap on the lender side, the borrower side, and the involved investors (some of which overlap with regular dividends:
Interest rates: as rates began to ease in in the last 24 months, dividend recap activity rebounded. Low interest rates = lower expected interest costs = lower hurdle for borrowing; more favorable credit conditions tend to spur dividend recap activity.
Exit/LP environment: when exit pathways are dire and DPI pressure is coming from LPs, there is a greater reliance on dividend recaps for liquidity
Private Equity vs. VC DNA: traditional venture assumes reinvest all cash for growth, accept zero liquidity until exit/secondaries, and generally avoid leverage. So if a VC board member is considering a dividend recap, they are essentially admitting the company has crossed into steady-state, cash-generative, low growth territory (aka VC zombie land). That’s not a failure but it’s not what the fund underwrote.
Durable profitability: similar to considerations for a regular dividend, a candidate for a dividend recap should have recurring revenue, low churn, predictable cash flow, and limited capex needs.
Growth capital x ROI: similar to considerations for a regular dividend, if reinvesting net income into growth is value-destructive and hoarding cash just bloats the balance sheet, then divs/dividend recaps can make sense.
Cap table dynamics: if a dividend recap is structured so common gets nothing, it can crush employee morale and create misalignment. Furthermore, if senior growth equity investors think there is a better mechanism for getting a return on their investment, they may block it.
Leverage tolerance: depending on the lenders perceived quality of the asset (not just financial performance but also competitive positioning, durability, etc), the lender may be uncomfortable lending at a typical leverage ratio (i.e., 2-4x EBITDA); if the company can’t get enough absolute dollar leverage, than the distributions to shareholders won’t “move the needle” for anyone.
VCs haven’t commonly gone for dividend recaps for a few main reasons (which may sound a bit repetitive to above):
LPAs often discourage debt-driven distributions in VC
Psychologically, dividend recaps feel like admitting the asset will never be unicorn-eqsue
But conditions today are more sensible for more frequent use of recaps as discussed early in this post:
Exits frozen
Fund lives stretching uncomfortably long (zombie funds!)
LPs laser-focused on DPI > TVPI
Thousands of profitable but exit-less companies
While we won’t go into a full blown example of a recap we’ll leave you with what a good dividend recap looks like:
Modest leverage (2-4x EBITDA, not PE-style)
Stress-tested downside
Management and investors voluntarily aligned
Transparent LP communication
Framed as non-recurring
If you enjoyed this article, feel free to view recent prior articles:
Ongoing Term Glossary
Anti-Dilution Rights: offer investors protection against dilution in unfavorable financing rounds. This term is usually not contentious from a negotiation perspective between founder and investor - in fact, studies have founds that 92-95% of preferred stock financings include some form of anti-dilution protection.
Authorized shares: the MAX number of shares of each class a company can issue without further shareholder approval.
Automatic Conversion: in the context of convertible notes (or SAFEs), a clause that triggers a convertible note to automatically convert into equity at maturity.
Board of directors: a group of individuals that represent sharesholders in major corporate decisions. A critical responsibility is the oversight of management - simply, the ability to fire of hire the CEO. Other board activities include assesing company performance, providing strategic guidance, developing corporate policy, approving budgets, options plans, mergers/IPOs, and fundraising.
Bridge Financing: when investors agree to provide temporary financing to secure a company’s cash balance before the company raises their next priced round - aka the bridge that gets you to your next priced round.
Capped Price: conversion price per share awarded to noteholder (or SAFE holder) if investor exercises valuation cap
Change in control: a significant shift in the ownership or control of a company, often triggering specific rights or obligations for investors (M&A most commonly)
Clawback provisions: provisions that give the company the right to buy back vested shares at the original issue price or at fair market value after dismissing an employee under defined circumstances (leaving for a competitor, severe misconduct, etc)
Co-Invest: triggered when a fund raises “one-off” new capital from LPs/investors (as opposed to pulling from existing permanent fund) to unlock ability to execute an investment; associated management fees and carry (if any) typically flow back to the fund or individual who raised the co-invest capital. Funds often give major LPs prioritized “co-invest“ rights, which gives such LPs the first rights to participate in the co-invest opportunity before others.
Comparable Company Analysis: a valuation methodology that entails identifying comparable companies and transactions to the company being valued as a means of deriving multiples that can be used to generate a landed valuation
Confidentiality: prevents the startup from disclosing the terms of a term sheet to outside parties (i.e., other investors, startups). This enables both parties to negotiate in good faith.
Convertible Note: a debt instrument that can be converted to equity based on the occurrence of certain events (most commonly during a priced equity financing round).
Conversion: convertible notes (and SAFEs) automatically convert into equity if certain triggers occur. The most common trigger that leads to the conversion of a convertible note (or SAFE) into equity is a priced equity financing round
Corporate governance: a set of principles and mechanisms that balances the interests of company stakeholders (not only shareholders but also employees, customers, suppliers, etc) and affects control over company decision-making
Co-Sale: the inverse of ROFR by nature; if a founder sells shares, the investors will have the opportunity to sell a proportional amount of their stock as well.
Cumulative dividends: accrue value and must be paid to investors upon a liquidity event (even if not declared), acting a like a debt-like liability that increases investor returns (not that different from accruing interest on the value of an investment via convertible note before it converts)
Debt repayment terms: in the context of convertible notes, defines specifics associated with principal, interest rate, maturity date, and default provisions.
Definitive documents: the legal contracts between the investors and the company that detail the terms of the transaction and are drafted by a lawyer
Dilution (D): losing a portion of your ownership as the company sells equity to investors
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis (DCF): a valuation methodology that entails forecasting the future cash flows of a business and discounting the cash flows by a determined cost of capital to derive an enterprise value
Discount: a discount is a term awarded to the convertible noteholder (or SAFE holder) that drives a reduction in the conversion price per share that they are awarded during a qualified financing. Discounts typically range from 10-30% with 20% being the most common.
Dividend Recap: a company borrows new money by issuing debt and uses the proceeds from the debt to pay a one time special dividend to shareholders after board approval. The idea is that the company has a strong enough cash flow dynamic to make interest and principal payments in the future
Down Round: when the pre-money valuation of a future financing is lower than the post-money valuation of the prior financing; often seen as a negative sign for the company
Double-trigger: requires two events to occur to accelerate the completion of your vesting. The first trigger is the acquisition, and the second trigger is the founder or employee getting terminated by the acquirer without cause or good reason in a specified period (typically one year)
Drag-Along Rights: in short, drag along rights enable majority shareholders often including VCs to force minority shareholders to participate in the sale of a company on the same terms. Minority shareholders are “dragged along” disabling them from holding out on a deal to try to get something better for themselves.
Employee Option Pool (EOP): stock that is reserved for existing and future employees to compensate, retain, and motivate workforce
Equity conversion terms: in the context of convertible notes, defines the specific event(s) that triggers conversion of debt to equity, the formula used during conversion (considering the impact of the valuation cap and/or discount – to be discussed), the type of equity received upon conversion by the note holder (common vs. preferred equity), and any associated rights the new equity holders will get after their convertible note is converted to equity (voting, dividends, etc).
Exclusivity: often referred to as a “no shop,” this provision locks parties into negotiating only with each other for a defined period (i.e., 30-60 days)
Exercise (options): buy options at the strike price
Full Ratchet Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward all the way the price of the shares issued in the new round. Full-Ratchet is the most investor friendly.
Fund Model: a forecasting exercise that a VC conducts to project what a successful fund will look like in terms of returns from each investment. VCs typically build a pathway to 3.0x net DPI
Indifference point: the price per share at which the noteholder or SAFE holder is indifferent between exercising the discount or valuation cap
Interest Rate & Payments: convertible notes often feature interest rates. Unlike a traditional loan, startups rarely pay the interest in cash to the convertible noteholder periodically. Instead, convertible notes accrue interest until the time of conversion.
Issued Shares: those that the company has issues to shareholders; can’t be greater than the number of shares authorized to be issued for that class
Lead Investor: primary investor(s) (co-leads can exist) in a funding round that set terms and typically are writing the largest check(s); often take a board seat
Legally nonbinding: refers to the nature of term sheets. A signed term sheet does not legally mandate a deal be completed
Liquidation Preference: is one of the rights that makes preferred stock more valuable than common stock and a large part of why investors agree to purchase the right to preferred stock (i.e., SAFEs or convertible notes) or purchase preferred stock directly during financings. Liquidation preference is the legal entitlement to receive a pre-determined portion of a company’s value in the event of a sale or liquidity event before the holders of common stock (i.e. the right to get paid first in an exit).
Major Investor: refers to a participating investor in a financing that surpasses a certain check size threshold, unlocking certain rights. I.e., “all those who invest over $500k will be deemed major investors and shall receive information and pro rata rights”
Maturity: the date at which the debt (plus any accrued interest) is due for repayment. This is typically 12, 18, or 24 months from the issuance of the convertible note. We will talk about conversion momentarily but the norm for a convertible note is that it has converted into equity prior to the maturity date
Maturity Extension: in the context of convertible notes, this entails moving the maturity date back. A common alternative to repayment is for the company and noteholders to agree to an extension on the maturity date of the note
Multiple: a ratio that is calculated by dividing the valuation of an asset by a specific item on the financial statements
Multiplier (Liquidation Preferences): Multiplier refers to the multiple on the original price per share of a class or series of preferred stock an investor is entitled to receive before others get paid. A 1x preference means getting paid one times the original investment, a 3x preference would mean getting paid three times the original investment back before the next most senior preference is paid.
Multiple on Invested Capital (MOIC): compares the value of an investment on the exit date to the initial equity contribution
Non-cumulative dividends only pay if declared by the board (thus do not accrue)
Non-priced financing: financing round in which founder and VC do not explicitly set a share price and thus do not set an associated pre-money valuation (i.e., convertible notes, SAFEs)
Option pool: an amount of common stock primarily reserved in the cap table for future employees (in certain cases, options can be pulled out of the option pool for existing employees/founders as well)
Optional conversion: in the context of convertible notes, entitles the noteholder to convert their note into equity if desired if the note is still outstanding on the maturity date.
Oustanding Shares: shares owned by shareholders such as investors or employees (could be in process of vesting).
Ownership (O): the % of a company a shareholder possesses prior to or post-closing of a financing.
Participation (Liquidation Preferences): is the right of a preferred stock to participate in remaining acquisition proceeds (on an as-converted to common stock basis, along with common stock) after the initial multiplier liquidation preference is satisfied. When preferred stockholders have a participation preference it’s called “double dipping” as preferred stockholder enjoys preferential return of capital in liquidation preference and then enjoys pro rata share of remaining proceeds. Participation can be capped (limited to a certain multiple) or uncapped.
Prepayment: in the context of convertible notes, payment of the principal and accrued interest by the startup before the note matures. This is generally only allowed if there is a majority of supermajority vote in favor of prepayment by the noteholders.
Post-Money Valuation (PO): the valuation of the company after the round size is invested by the VC(s)
Pre-Money Valuation (PM): what the investor is valuing the company at TODAY, prior to the investment
Priced round/financing: a round of financing in which the valuation and price per share of a unit of stock being sold is officially determined (as opposed to a SAFE or convertible note in which case the valuation is left officially undetermined)
Price Per Share (PPS): the cost of acquiring a share of company x, typically determined by pre-money valuation and fully diluted shares outstanding prior to close of financing
Primary transaction: is when the company (the “issuer”) sells shares for the first time to investors. Primary issuances must comply with U.S. securities laws — meaning they must either be registered or qualify for an exemption.
Principal: in the context of convertible notes, the amount of investment provided by the noteholder (investor) to the company through the convertible note. In an unfortunate scenario where the note never converts to equity (we will discuss this), the principal (plus any accrued interest) is what the company owes the noteholder (unless nuanced legal terms dictate otherwise). Assuming the note does convert to equity (the norm), the principal (plus any accrued interest) is the quantity used to calculate how many shares the note holder will receive upon conversion into equity.
Pro rata rights: give investors the right (but not obligation) to participate in future rounds of financing to maintain their initial level of percentage ownership in the company.
Pro rata on a dollar-for-dollar basis: gives the investor the right to invest an amount equal to or less than the amount invested in their first round à VC Z invested 200K in the seed round and has the right to invest 200k in the Series A
Pro rata on a fixed sum basis: least common, investors get the right to continue investing an amount as agreed upon that is decoupled from the investment amount. VC Z, who invested $1M in a seed, negotiates pro rata rights up to $700K - they will be able to invest up to $700K in each subsequent round of financing.
Pro Rata ROFR: gives particular investor(s) the right to another investors voluntarily waived pro rata in a future financing
Protective provisions (negative controls) are contractual clauses that have the goal of preventing the company and its shareholders from taking actions without getting explicit consent of the investors protected by the provisions. They effectively are veto rights that investors (preferred shareholders) have on actions so that they are protected against expropriation.
Qualified financing: in the context of convertible notes/SAFEs, the round size of an equity financing typically must meet a certain dollar threshold to trigger conversion into equity.
QSBS: a tax benefit under Section 1202 that incentivizes investment into small businesses (often startups) with less than $50 million in aggregate gross asset value. Investors who purchase stock (common or preferred) directly (as opposed to via secondaries) from a c-corp business with less than $50 million in aggregate gross asset value and hold that investment for > 5 years, followed by a sale of the held stock, can avoid paying capital gains tax. The tax exclusion can be up to 100% of the gain, subject to limits: the greater of $10 million or 10x the original investment. Recently big beautiful bill updates: 1/ asset value threshold up to $75 million, 2/ cap limit extended to higher of $15 million or 10x investment, and 3/ exclusion starts to come into play after just three years (at 50% exclusion potential).
QSBS Gain Deferral: if you have to liquidate a position before the QSBS holding period requirement ends, you can defer the tax on capital gains, by reinvesting the gains into another QSBS qualified business within 60 days of liquidation. You also get to roll over the holding period of the original investment, continuing the clock (as opposed to starting over).
Redemption rights: allow the investor to sell their shares back to the company for a guaranteed return (often at the original puchase price), granting them a guaranteed exit/liquidity path no matter what.
Registration Rights: defines the circumstances in which investors can require the company to register its shares or piggyback on a registration of other classes of stock.
Repayment: in the context of convertible notes, the process of paying back the debt (plus any accrued interest) due to noteholders
Restricted Stock: company stock given to employees, usually as a bonus or additional compensation; does not have a strike price unlike options; usually awarded to company directors and executives and is subject to vesting
ROFR: gives existing shareholders the first chance to buy shares from an existing shareholder who is attempting to sell them to an outside third party. In simple terms, if I want to sell my shares in a startup as a founder or investor, I need to give existing company shareholders the right to purchase my stock at the agreed upon price with the third party first
Round Size or Investment Amount (R): how much capital the founder is raising for the financing or VC round
RSUs: refers to an agreement by a company to issue employees shares on a future date. One RSU is the right to get one common share. RSUs, like options, are also subject to a time-based vesting schedule and can be trigger based; however, RSUs don’t have a strike price and are instead released directly to the recipient after vesting without any need to “exercise” or buy them; typically awarded to lower level employees than restricted stock
SAFE: an agreement between an investor and a company that converts into equity in the next financing round if certain conditions are met
Secondary Transaction: the resale of existing shares by a current stockholder. A secondary occurs either: when the company buys back the shares (a redemption), or when a stockholder sells their shares to a third party (a transfer). Secondaries are also subject to securities rules, but the requirements are generally lighter for non-affiliated stockholders — especially in true peer-to-peer sales.
Seniority (Liquidation Preferences): refers to whether preference is senior, junior or even (pari passu) with other preferred stock. Senior preference means having a first-tier liquidation right, junior preference means having a liquidation right that is paid after the senior preferred and pari passu means preference amongst different preferred stock is the same time.
Single-trigger: states that only one event must occur to accelerate the vesting of your equity. If the company is acquired, you gain complete ownership over all your options
Stock options: incentive mechanisms granted to employees, advisors, and consultants. Employees joining a VC-backed startup typically receive an option grant, which allows them to acquire company common shares in the future at a certain price by “exercising vested options”
Strike Price: the predetermined price an employee pays to exercise (aka purchase) their stock options and turn their stock options into actual shares of the company owned outright. Tax regulations (IRS Section 409a) require options grants to have a strike price equal to or above the fair market value of the underlying company stock on the date that the option is granted
‘Success disaster’: employees run the risk of being harmed financially for building a succeeding business that has grown in value significantly
Supermajority: require votes in excess of the majority; frequenty established in the charter and typically only apply to certain scenarios / investor classes. Supermajority thresholds are often set to give a minority investor veto power.
Supervoting: Supervoting shares entails one class of shares having more votes than another voting class of shares. It distances cash flow and voting rights from each other. In the VC industry supervoting has been heavily debated as companies with supervoting like Theranos, Uber, and WeWork have encountered governance controversies. Founders are typically the beneficiaries (for better or worse) as their voting power becomes a multiple (like 10x) of their share count.
Tag-Along Rights: tag-along rights are triggered when the majority shareholders decide to sell the company. In a similar but opposite nature to Drag-Along, Tag-Along protects minority shareholder’s right to exit alongside the majority. While drag-along “forces” the minority to sell, tag-along allows the minority to sell on the same terms as the majority so they are not left behind
Tender Offer: is a proposal by a buyer (often an investor or the company itself) to purchase shares from multiple stockholders during a set time window and at a set price.
Uncapped Note/SAFE: a convertible note (or SAFE) that lacks a valuation cap
Up Round: when the pre-money valuation of a future financing is higher than the post-money valuation of the prior financing; often seen as a positive sign for the company
Valuation: the process of deriving an enterprise value for a company
Valuation Cap: a valuation cap is an investor favorable terms that puts a ceiling on the conversion price at which a convertible note or SAFE would convert into the equity security sold at the qualified financing.
VC Valuation Method: a valuation methodology that entails projecting a company’s exit value in the future and a VC’s required MOIC in order to back into an implied valuation and ownership level at time of investment (starting with the future and backing into the present)
Vesting: the process of gaining ownership over granted stock options
Voluntary conversion: in the context of convertible notes, gives the investor (noteholder) the power to convert into equity whenever desired (even before maturity) under specified details, negating any prepayment potential
Warrants: when issued/contracted, give the warrant holder the right to buy a certain number of shares of the company’s common or preferred stock at a predefined price over a specified period
Weighted Average Anti-Dilution Protection: adjusts the conversion price of the protected securities downward to a value between the price originally paid by the protected investor and the price paid by the investors in the current (down) round.
PM + R = PO ➡️ the pre-money valuation plus the round size = the post-money valuation
PO – R = PM ➡️ the post-money valuation minus the round size = the pre-money valuation
PM / FDSO = PPS ➡️ the pre-money valuation divided by shares outstanding = price per share
R / PO = O ➡️ round size divided by the post-money valuation is the amount of ownership acquired in a financing by participating investors
D / PO = Daniel’s O ➡️ Daniel’s investment divided by the post-money valuation is the amount of ownership Daniel is acquiring in a financing
Fundraising
Rule #1: Communicate early and consistently. Goal: build long term relationships with a roster of investors before you kick off a process.
Rule #2: Ask for help. The only way to get maximal value out of your cap table is by asking for help. Especially when times are tough, great investors can potentially be the difference between make or break.
Rule #3: Keep knocking. As hard as it is, keep communicating with rejectors and make them aware of your progress.
Dont #1: OVER-FOMOing
Don’t #2: Focusing on who instead of what
Don’t #3: Exaggerating objectively “auditable” traction
Don’t #4: Asking for follow up intros from rejectors
Is there a topic you’d like us to cover? Don’t be a stranger! Ever want to dive deeper on a topic in VC Investing or Law?
We can be reached here:
Daniel Faierman ➡️ [email protected]
Chuck Cotter ➡️ [email protected]
If you enjoyed this post, please share on LinkedIn, X (fka Twitter), Meta and elsewhere. It goes a long way to support us! If you didn’t, don’t be scared to unsubscribe (we appreciate honest feedback).
📢 Follow the Term Sheet Pitfalls authors on LinkedIn:
✍️ Written by Daniel Faierman and Chuck Cotter

Disclaimer: The information provided in this entry does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal or investment advice; instead, all information, content, and materials available in this entry are for general informational purposes only.

